2022
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.13208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust local slope estimation by deep learning

Abstract: In the seismic community, the local slope is essential for various applications, including structure prediction, seislet transform, trace interpolation and denoising. The most popular method to calculate slope is the plane-wave destruction, which assumes that the seismic data can be represented by local plane waves. However, the plane-wave destruction method fails when the seismic data become very noisy. Taking random noise into consideration, we adopt the deep learning method to calculate the local slope. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irregular noise occurs randomly, and has no typical frequency band and propagation direction. To improve the SNR of seismic data, many methods have been proposed, such as median filters [3,4], predictive filters [5][6][7][8], sparse transformation [9][10][11][12], rank reduction theory [13,14], empirical mode decomposition [15][16][17][18][19][20], and deep learning assistant methods [21][22][23][24][25]. Although a lot of tests demonstrate that these methods can effectively suppress random and linear noise, they are difficult to completely remove outlier noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irregular noise occurs randomly, and has no typical frequency band and propagation direction. To improve the SNR of seismic data, many methods have been proposed, such as median filters [3,4], predictive filters [5][6][7][8], sparse transformation [9][10][11][12], rank reduction theory [13,14], empirical mode decomposition [15][16][17][18][19][20], and deep learning assistant methods [21][22][23][24][25]. Although a lot of tests demonstrate that these methods can effectively suppress random and linear noise, they are difficult to completely remove outlier noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%