2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2185-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust joint score tests in the application of DNA methylation data analysis

Abstract: BackgroundRecently differential variability has been showed to be valuable in evaluating the association of DNA methylation to the risks of complex human diseases. The statistical tests based on both differential methylation level and differential variability can be more powerful than those based only on differential methylation level. Anh and Wang (2013) proposed a joint score test (AW) to simultaneously detect for differential methylation and differential variability. However, AW’s method seems to be quite c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results revealed that GSDMD was not detected in the normal glial cells, but glioma tissues were detected with medium or low staining ( Figure 1 B,C). In addition, it is well known that methylation is an important regulatory factor in gene expression [ 25 ]. Then, we further analyzed the GSDMD methylation in GBM primary tumors and normal tissues from the TCGA database, while data for LGG are not available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results revealed that GSDMD was not detected in the normal glial cells, but glioma tissues were detected with medium or low staining ( Figure 1 B,C). In addition, it is well known that methylation is an important regulatory factor in gene expression [ 25 ]. Then, we further analyzed the GSDMD methylation in GBM primary tumors and normal tissues from the TCGA database, while data for LGG are not available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this test can be re-formulated in a regression framework [14,15], it can be extended to continuous exposures. Methods for jointly testing mean and variability have also been proposed [7,[14][15][16][17][18][19], although these approaches are either limited by sensitivity to distributional assumptions or are restricted to binary exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this test can be re-formulated in a regression framework 10,11 , it can be extended to continuous exposures. Methods for jointly testing mean and variability have also been proposed 4,10,11,12,13,14,15 , although these approaches are either limited by sensitivity to distributional assumptions or are restricted to binary exposures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%