2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.j057172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Implicit Direct Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Simulating the Compressible Turbulent Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both references report similar convergence history using numerical Jacobian and analytical Jacobians. However, reference [45] finds that simulations with analytical Jacobian has better efficiency. From the point of view of software design, this replaces a numerical method and a set of operations that are highly dependent of the type of equation solved by a more general finite difference scheme and an existing residual evaluator N(u).…”
Section: Implementation Of the Ns Equations Related Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both references report similar convergence history using numerical Jacobian and analytical Jacobians. However, reference [45] finds that simulations with analytical Jacobian has better efficiency. From the point of view of software design, this replaces a numerical method and a set of operations that are highly dependent of the type of equation solved by a more general finite difference scheme and an existing residual evaluator N(u).…”
Section: Implementation Of the Ns Equations Related Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both references report similar convergence history using numerical Jacobian and analytical Jacobians. However, reference [45] finds that simulations with analytical Jacobian has better efficiency.…”
Section: Implementation Of the Ns Equations Related Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it is combined with the simple numerical flux formula of the direct DG method to approximate the gradient of conserved variables. In summary, the new DDGIC method defines multiple individual diffusion processes, each of which is combined to calculate the viscous numerical fluxes for 2-D compressible NS equations as (21) + ∇(ρu) h • ξ (22) + ∇(ρv) h • ξ (23) ∇ρ h • ξ (31) + ∇(ρu) h • ξ (32) + ∇(ρv) h • ξ (33) ∇ρ h • ξ (41) + ∇(ρu) h • ξ (42) + ∇(ρv) h • ξ (43)…”
Section: The New Ddgic Scheme Formulation For 2-d Compressible Navier...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the interface correction term can be simplified and computed as follows (21) + (ρu) h ξ (22) + (ρv) h ξ (23) • ∇φ j (x, y) ρ h ξ (31) + (ρu) h ξ (32) + (ρv) h ξ (33) • ∇φ j (x, y) ρ h ξ (41) + (ρu) h ξ (42) + (ρv) h ξ (43) + E h ξ (44) • ∇φ j (x, y)…”
Section: The New Ddgic Scheme Formulation For 2-d Compressible Navier...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation