2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2017.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust identification for nonlinear errors-in-variables systems using the EM algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Bottegal et al proposed a two-experiment method to identify Wiener systems by using the data acquired from two separate experiments, in which the first experiment estimates the static nonlinearity and the second experiment identifies the linear block based on the estimated nonlinearity [23]. For nonlinear errors-in-variables systems contaminated with outliers, a robust identification approach is presented by means of the expectation maximization under the framework of the maximum likelihood estimation [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bottegal et al proposed a two-experiment method to identify Wiener systems by using the data acquired from two separate experiments, in which the first experiment estimates the static nonlinearity and the second experiment identifies the linear block based on the estimated nonlinearity [23]. For nonlinear errors-in-variables systems contaminated with outliers, a robust identification approach is presented by means of the expectation maximization under the framework of the maximum likelihood estimation [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work of Pearson, different kinds of outliers, several experimental outlier‐contaminated data records, and some specific algorithms to deal with such noises have been presented. In the literature, a large number of models have been utilized for representing outliers, some of which are non‐Gaussian distributions such as α ‐stable noise, t‐distribution, and amplitude‐modulated binary‐state sequence such as Bernoulli‐Gaussian . Furthermore, for the purpose of outlier detection, outlying measurements has been represented deterministically .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iterative formulas to estimate the model parameter u, scale parameter r and output time-delay t i are provided in equations (30), (32) and (33), respectively. The proposed robust global identification approach for LPV FIR model with slowly sampled outputs is concluded in Algorithm 1.…”
Section: Brief Introduction To Em Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust observation models like Laplace distribution model, 24 Student’s t -distribution model 19 and contaminated Gaussian distribution model are all effective to deal with this problem. Guo et al 30 employed the Student’s t -distribution to model the measurement noise and a robust approach for the errors-in-variables system identification was derived under the framework of EM algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%