2006 American Control Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2006.1657236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust hybrid controllers for continuous-time systems with applications to obstacle avoidance and regulation to disconnected set of points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding stability analysis would need to carefully consider the fact that convergence to a single attitude implies convergence to either of the two disconnected, antipodal points on S 3 [22]. This requires a continuous selection of the sign of quaternions or a discontinuous control system, which are shown to be sensitive to small measurement noise [23]. Without these considerations, a quaternion-based controller can exhibit an unwinding phenomenon, where the controller unnecessarily rotates the attitude through large angles [15].…”
Section: E Properties and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding stability analysis would need to carefully consider the fact that convergence to a single attitude implies convergence to either of the two disconnected, antipodal points on S 3 [22]. This requires a continuous selection of the sign of quaternions or a discontinuous control system, which are shown to be sensitive to small measurement noise [23]. Without these considerations, a quaternion-based controller can exhibit an unwinding phenomenon, where the controller unnecessarily rotates the attitude through large angles [15].…”
Section: E Properties and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeit this control law avoids unwinding, a careful look reveals a strong sensitivity around attitudes that are up to π away from the desired attitude about some axis-that is, η = 0. In view of Theorem 2.6 of [33], one can see that such control law isn't robust in the sense that arbitrarily small measurement noises can force η to stay near to 0 for initial conditions within its neighborhood. Indeed, similar to Theorem 3.2 of [11], one can even exhibit an explicit noise signal to persistently trap the system about a fixed pose, thus preventing its stability.…”
Section: Prior Work On Pose Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, even using a (memoryless) discontinuous state feedback, it is impossible to achieve robust global asymptotic stabilization of a disconnected set of points resulted from the double covering of the SE(3) [9], [10].…”
Section: Hybrid Pose Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in [9], however, nonhybrid strategies are prone to chattering and are not robust to arbitrarily small measurement noise since it is impossible to use pure discontinuous state feedback to achieve robust global asymptotic stabilization of a disconnected set of points [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%