2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2011.6116500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust head pose estimation via Convex Regularized Sparse Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 3, we show the F-Score of classification for each frame size (w=5, 6,7,8,9,10,15,20,25,35,45, 55 and 64) and with different alphabet size (a=5, 6, 7, 8, 64, 128). We classified the poses using K-means algorithm into three main classes: class of frontal pose, class of the left view, and class of the right view that group poses in quarter profile (left or right) at full profile.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 3, we show the F-Score of classification for each frame size (w=5, 6,7,8,9,10,15,20,25,35,45, 55 and 64) and with different alphabet size (a=5, 6, 7, 8, 64, 128). We classified the poses using K-means algorithm into three main classes: class of frontal pose, class of the left view, and class of the right view that group poses in quarter profile (left or right) at full profile.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different regressors have been suggested. Li et al [5] used Support Vector Regressors (SVRs), Gaussian Progress Regression (GPR) [6] and Convex Regularized Sparse Regression (CRSR) [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAE (Balasubramanian et al, 2007) Biased Isomap 5.02°B iased LLE 2.11°B iased LE 1.44° ( Liu et al, 2010) Manifold clustering 3.16° ( Ji et al, 2011) Regression 6.1° ( Dahmane et al, 2014) Symmetry classification 3.14° ( Narayanan et al, 2014) CE 5.55°C enter CE 5.26°B oundary CE 5.28°P roposed Method HYE1 5.2°H YE2 4.8°I…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reco. rates (Stiefelhagen, 2004) 9.5°52% (Gourier et al, 2007) Human Performance 11.8°40.7% Associative Memories 10.1°50.0% (Tu et al, 2007) High-order SVD 12.9°49.25% PCA 14.11°55.20% LEA 15.88°45.16% (Ji et al, 2011) Regression 8.6°- (Narayanan et al, 2014) CE 7.2°-Center CE 6.82°-Boundary CE 6.9°-Proposed Method HYE1 6.96°63.81% HYE2 7.15°59.05%…”
Section: Methods Maementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation