2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2012.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust H? static output feedback controller design for parameter dependent polynomial systems: An iterative sums of squares approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the procedure to obtain the speed controller for normal operation is explained. The design strategy has been developed by using Lyapunov methods and applying optimization techniques over polynomials (see for the details on the technique and for other recent applications). For these techniques, a dynamical polynomial model of the system is assumed to be available, fulfilling leftalignrightalign-oddalign-even=fMathClass-open(xMathClass-close)+gMathClass-open(xMathClass-close)w,fMathClass-open(0MathClass-close)=0rightalign-label(12) where x is the state vector, w are the inputs and f ( x ) and g ( x ) are given polynomial vectorial functions.…”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the procedure to obtain the speed controller for normal operation is explained. The design strategy has been developed by using Lyapunov methods and applying optimization techniques over polynomials (see for the details on the technique and for other recent applications). For these techniques, a dynamical polynomial model of the system is assumed to be available, fulfilling leftalignrightalign-oddalign-even=fMathClass-open(xMathClass-close)+gMathClass-open(xMathClass-close)w,fMathClass-open(0MathClass-close)=0rightalign-label(12) where x is the state vector, w are the inputs and f ( x ) and g ( x ) are given polynomial vectorial functions.…”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao and Wang proposed a stabilizing output feedback via a polynomial Lyapunov function where the effect the nonlinear term on trueP˙false(xfalse) is minimized by imposing a bound to deal with the nonconvex term in the stabilizing condition. Krug et al studied an iterative SOS approach for a robust H ∞ SOF control of parameter dependent polynomial systems. Meng et al proposed a linear Lyapunov function for positive polynomial fuzzy systems where fuzzy system rules and fuzzy controller rules do not share the same premises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Imposing a bound on the nonlinear derivative term trueP˙false(xfalse) and forming an optimization problem to obtain zero optimum . (3) An iterative SOS procedure is proposed for the SOF being genetically nonconvex . (4) To use constant Lyapunov P methods instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the nonlinearities of the systems of the related works are restricted by constraint conditions and some boundary conditions are needed for the sake of solving some dynamic equations in the work of Ghaffari et al Besides the general nonlinear systems, there exists an important class of nonlinear systems, ie, polynomial nonlinear systems. Recently, along with the research progress on the control of nonlinear polynomial systems, several sum of squares–based approaches are presented to solve the H ∞ control problem of nonlinear polynomial systems . However, the disadvantage of the method of sum of squares is that it is incapable to solve the polynomial inequality containing nonlinear combination of unknown values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%