2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust fuzzy Lyapunov stabilization for uncertain and disturbed Takagi–Sugeno descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the quadratic approach presents serious limitations because its solutions are inherently pessimistic, i.e., there are stable or stabilizable models which do not have a quadratic solution (see [10] and references therein). Conservativeness comes from different sources: the type of TS model [11,12], the way the membership functions are dropped-off to obtain LMI expressions [13][14][15], the integration of membership-function information [16,17], or the choice of Lyapunov function [18,19]. This work is concerned with a relaxation in the latter sense which demands a change of perspective from global to local conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the quadratic approach presents serious limitations because its solutions are inherently pessimistic, i.e., there are stable or stabilizable models which do not have a quadratic solution (see [10] and references therein). Conservativeness comes from different sources: the type of TS model [11,12], the way the membership functions are dropped-off to obtain LMI expressions [13][14][15], the integration of membership-function information [16,17], or the choice of Lyapunov function [18,19]. This work is concerned with a relaxation in the latter sense which demands a change of perspective from global to local conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "virtual dynamics" is introduced in the output error ( ) to avoid the crossing terms resulting from the observer's gains and system matrices multiplication [25]. This latter can be expressed as given by (34), where 0 is a zero matrix.…”
Section: Fig3 Tracking Fault Tolerant Controller Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (8), to avoid the crossing terms resulting from the observer's gains 1 i H and system matrices ( i C and i D ) multiplication, we introduce a "virtual dynamics" in the output error ( ) y et [11] [12]. This latter can be expressed as:…”
Section: Fault Tolerant Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%