2011
DOI: 10.1214/11-aos923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust functional principal components: A projection-pursuit approach

Abstract: In many situations, data are recorded over a period of time and may be regarded as realizations of a stochastic process. In this paper, robust estimators for the principal components are considered by adapting the projection pursuit approach to the functional data setting. Our approach combines robust projection-pursuit with different smoothing methods. Consistency of the estimators are shown under mild assumptions. The performance of the classical and robust procedures are compared in a simulation study under… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither functional principal components derived from the covariance operator nor least-squares regression methods are robust to anomalous observations and this remains true even if penalized estimators are used. To obtain a robust method we instead propose combining M-estimators of location for functional data, (Sinova et al, 2018), functional principal components based on projection pursuit, (Bali et al, 2011), and MM estimators for regression (Yohai, 1987). We briefly review these ideas and explain their place in our proposal.…”
Section: A Robust Functional Principal Component Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neither functional principal components derived from the covariance operator nor least-squares regression methods are robust to anomalous observations and this remains true even if penalized estimators are used. To obtain a robust method we instead propose combining M-estimators of location for functional data, (Sinova et al, 2018), functional principal components based on projection pursuit, (Bali et al, 2011), and MM estimators for regression (Yohai, 1987). We briefly review these ideas and explain their place in our proposal.…”
Section: A Robust Functional Principal Component Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is well-known that the sample variance is heavily influenced by outlying observations, Bali et al (2011) proposed using a robust scale functional as the objective function. There are several candidates for the robust scale, but we opt for the Qn estimator (Rousseeuw and Croux, 1993).…”
Section: A Robust Functional Principal Component Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus in general, the eigenvalues of the SSCM are less separated than those of V 0 , which is one reason why the use of the SSCM for robust principal component analysis has been questioned (e.g. Bali, Boente, Tyler, and Wang 2011;Magyar and Tyler 2014). However, the differences appear to be generally small in higher dimensions.…”
Section: Eigenvalues Of S(x)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fPCR method was first proposed by Reiss and Ogden , but they fail to account for the phase variability found in functional data. Additionally, one could use a robust fPCA method such as Bali et al , but this method also fails to account for phase and amplitude variability explicitly in the data. We then extend this framework to the logistic regression case where the response can take on categorical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%