2012
DOI: 10.1177/0959651812452480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust fractional order controller based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for the wind turbine equipped with a doubly fed asynchronous machine

Abstract: In this paper, an improvement of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed. The aim of this algorithm is to determine the optimal parameters of a robust fractional order controller which guarantees stability and robustness of required nominal performances. Controllers with fractional order are first obtained by a previous transformation of the multi-objective optimization problem into an equivalent single-optimization problem, and then solved by the proposed improved particle swarm optimization alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noting that, in the ( d q ) -axis, both current components I ds and I qs are considered as constant in the steady state. Consequently, their derivatives are equal to zero (Belfedal et al, 2010; Sedraoui and Boudjehem, 2012). Thus, the rotor voltage vector V r = [ V dr V qr ] T is considered as a set-control vector that is provided by a proposed fractional controller.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Noting that, in the ( d q ) -axis, both current components I ds and I qs are considered as constant in the steady state. Consequently, their derivatives are equal to zero (Belfedal et al, 2010; Sedraoui and Boudjehem, 2012). Thus, the rotor voltage vector V r = [ V dr V qr ] T is considered as a set-control vector that is provided by a proposed fractional controller.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, let us consider y = [ V ds V qs ] T and x s = [ ϕ dr ϕ qr ] T as the output vector and the state-variable vector of the plant-model that modelled the DFIG, respectively. By using the numerical data that is summarized in Table 2 (Belfedal et al, 2010; Sedraoui and Boudjehem, 2012), the state-space representation is determined by applying the MATLAB® function Linmod2 on the Simulink system, which is etablished from Equations (29) and (30). The transfer matrix of the nominal plant-model is determined by…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations