2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust force control with a feed-forward inverse model controller for electro-hydraulic control loading systems of flight simulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When left pressure is applied to the aileron control, which is a counterclockwise rotation of aileron and elevator controls or the left deflection of the control stick or side stick controller, the airplane's left wing banks (rolls) lower in relation to the pilot [33][34][35]. Think of this movement from the pilot's head to the pilot's left hip [36]; explaining some behavior of the flight the velocity (V) is defined by (4) as well as forces and moments ( ) by (5) and (6) [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When left pressure is applied to the aileron control, which is a counterclockwise rotation of aileron and elevator controls or the left deflection of the control stick or side stick controller, the airplane's left wing banks (rolls) lower in relation to the pilot [33][34][35]. Think of this movement from the pilot's head to the pilot's left hip [36]; explaining some behavior of the flight the velocity (V) is defined by (4) as well as forces and moments ( ) by (5) and (6) [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li [27] designed a robust control strategy for an electrohydraulic load simulator with µ synthesis theory, and the robust stability and performance were analyzed. Zhao [28] constructed a model disturbance observer with offline designed approximate inverse model to suppress the extraneous force, and this method was further modified in [29], where a robust outer loop controller was added to ensure the desired force replication performance in high-frequency region. Karpenko [30] proposed a nonlinear QFT controller to desensitize the control loop to actuator's dynamic uncertainties caused by system nonlinearities and typical variations of actuator parameters, and auxiliary compensation filters were also designed to further shape the reference tracking and regulating responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the measured acceleration waveform with the TVC remain imperfect because acceleration waveform tracking performances may be effected by non-linear properties of electro-hydraulic servo systems (Kenta et al, 2009; Niksefat and Sepehri, 2001; Yao et al, 2016), especially the dynamic characteristics of servo-valves and hydraulic actuators (Shen et al, 2016; Zhao et al, 2016a, 2016b). Hence, a feed-forward inverse model (FFIM) compensator is employed to improve the acceleration waveform tracking accuracy by compensating for the dynamic characteristics of servo-valves and hydraulic actuators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, how to accurately estimate dynamic models or transfer functions of the REST is a critical issue. Some identification algorithms were employed to estimate dynamic models or transfer functions of the REST, such as the H1 estimator (Guan et al, 2014a, 2014b; Joris et al, 2003), least-squares estimator (Wu et al, 2014; Ziaei and Sepehri, 2000), recursive least-squares algorithm (Zhao et al, 2016a, 2016b) and recursive extended least-squares (RELS) algorithm (Shen et al, 2013a, 2016), adaptive inverse control algorithm (Rigney et al, 2010; Shen et al, 2013b) and state-space model (Joris et al, 2003; Vaes et al, 2007). How to accurately design a stable inverse model using the estimated dynamic model or transfer function is the second critical issue, because the estimated discrete-time model is a non-minimum phase (NMP) system and its direct inverse model is unstable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%