2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust finite element model updating using Taguchi method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aerodynamic calculation by panel method is first compared with complex variables based analytical solution (19) ; the pressure distributions of Van de Vooren airfoil are shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aerodynamic calculation by panel method is first compared with complex variables based analytical solution (19) ; the pressure distributions of Van de Vooren airfoil are shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite element based structural analysis has been performed using Hermitian beam elements, and the natural frequency is calculated via QR decomposition method using global mass matrix and global stiffness matrix (19) . In the airfoil design problem, an interdisciplinary design variable is t IDV , and disciplinary design variables in aerodynamics and structures subspaces are k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 and t 1 ,t 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Structures Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, relative weights of natural frequencies and mode shapes should be chosen carefully. 23,47 Since natural frequencies are more accurately measured than mode shapes, the weighting value corresponding to natural frequencies W ω has been set higher than the weighting coefficient of mode shapes W M AC . These factors depend also on the number of measured modes taken for each analysed structure.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors depend also on the number of measured modes taken for each analysed structure. In this work, the weighting coefficients have been selected after several tests and several runs of the updating process, starting with weighting proposition given in, 47 and adjusting it in order to obtain the best value of the objective function.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays it is well understood that the effects of uncertainties have to be taken into account to update (or to indentify) a computational model and to optimize a design with a computational model. For instance, robust updating (or robust identification) has recently been proposed in the context of structural dynamics [34,41,42,45]. Similarly, robust design optimization has been proposed in different areas [16,33,37,46,47,49,51,65,67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%