2017
DOI: 10.1109/jphotov.2017.2667724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Feedback Linearizing Control With Sliding Mode Compensation for a Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Inverter System Under Unbalanced Grid Voltages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [11], a feedback linearizing control (FLC) with sliding mode LVRT scheme for a PV system is suggested. The proposed control scheme contains normal and abnormal conditions.…”
Section: Lvrt Control Strategies For Pv Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [11], a feedback linearizing control (FLC) with sliding mode LVRT scheme for a PV system is suggested. The proposed control scheme contains normal and abnormal conditions.…”
Section: Lvrt Control Strategies For Pv Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, power and energy engineers everywhere are pondering the challenges of operation of PV power station under abnormal conditions, as it is the most way to improve the power quality, stability and reliability of utility grid with the high penetration of the PV systems [10]. To achieve the stable operation and appropriate integration, it is required for PV systems to provide a low-voltage ride-through (LVRT) capability and maintain grid functionality during fault conditions [11]. Even though many studies have been done to handle the challenging problems of supporting utility grid during abnormal conditions, there appears to be an absence of a comprehensive study on LVRT methods in PV systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under normal operation, the EMS gets the real and reactive power demands P ∗ ( t ) and Q ∗ ( t ) from the grid operator (GO). If a voltage sag is detected, P ∗ ( t ) is obtained from the GO, while Q ∗ ( t ) is set equal to the fault reactive power Q f a u l t ( t ), which is calculated locally by the EMS as follows: Qfaultfalse(tfalse)={array0,arrayifVsag(t)0.1array2Vsag(t)Qmax,arrayif0.1<Vsag(t)0.5arrayQmax,arrayifVsag(t)>0.5., where Q m a x is the maximum reactive power set to be delivered by the hybrid PV‐FC source and V s a g ( t ) is defined as Vsagfalse(tfalse)=true[1minfalse(Vgrid,armsfalse(tfalse),Vgrid,brmsfalse(tfalse),Vgrid,crmsfalse(tfalse)false)Vbasetrue]. At the same time, the EMS also calculates a scaling factor k s c to curtail the active power delivered to the grid and avoid overcurrents due to voltage sag as ksc={array1ksc1max(ia(t),ib(t),ic(t)),…”
Section: Energy Management Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Q max is the maximum reactive power set to be delivered by the hybrid PV-FC source and V sag (t) is defined as 21,25 V sag (t) =…”
Section: Energy Management Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation