2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00181-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust fault-tolerant self-recovering control of nonlinear uncertain systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the crucial problem with practical implementation of (13) is that it requires y f,k+1 and u f,k to calculate f k and hence it cannot be directly used to obtain (9). To settle this problem, it is assumed that there exists a diagonal matrix α k such that f k ∼ =f k = α k f k−1 and hence the practical form of (9) boils down to…”
Section: Fault Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the crucial problem with practical implementation of (13) is that it requires y f,k+1 and u f,k to calculate f k and hence it cannot be directly used to obtain (9). To settle this problem, it is assumed that there exists a diagonal matrix α k such that f k ∼ =f k = α k f k−1 and hence the practical form of (9) boils down to…”
Section: Fault Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In passive FTC [6][7][8][9], controllers are designed to be robust against a set of presumed faults, therefore there is no need for fault detection, but such a design usually degrades the overall performance. In the contrast to passive ones, active FTC schemes, react to system components faults actively by reconfiguring control actions, and by doing so the system stability and acceptable performance is maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, within certain margins, the control law has inherent fault tolerant capabilities, allowing the system to cope with the fault presence. Chen et al (1998), Liang et al (2000) and Qu et al (2003), among many others, provide complete descriptions of passive FTC techniques. On the other hand, active FTC techniques consist in adapting the control law using the information given by the FDI (Fault Detection and Isolation) block (Blanke et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique the control laws are fixed and the fault is considered as a system disturbance or uncertainty. In fact, the control law is designed to preserve the system performance either in healthy or in faulty situation using robust control techniques, see Chen and Patton [1999], Qu et al [2001], and Qu et al [2003]. Most complex industrial systems either exhibit nonlinear behaviour or involve both discrete and continuous components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%