2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust exact differentiators with predefined convergence time

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure generalizes to an arbitrary order and arbitrary degrees that proposed in [20] for the first order differentiator with d 0 = −1. Note that this scaling, using two parameters, is novel also for the homogeneous case.…”
Section: Convergence Acceleration and Scaling The Lipschitz Constant ∆mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This procedure generalizes to an arbitrary order and arbitrary degrees that proposed in [20] for the first order differentiator with d 0 = −1. Note that this scaling, using two parameters, is novel also for the homogeneous case.…”
Section: Convergence Acceleration and Scaling The Lipschitz Constant ∆mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In [13] also a switching strategy between homogeneous differentiators with restricted degrees is presented. This work can be seen as an extension to an arbitrary order of the smooth strategy of combining two homogeneous differentiators proposed in [14], [15], [16], and in the recent work [20]. Our construction extends to the discontinuous case the recursive observer design developed for continuous homogeneous observers in [23], [24] and highly improved in [12], [25] for continuous bl-homogeneous observers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 4 (Conservatism of the prescribed UBST) The estimated UBST of the finite-time or fixed-time ESOs [38][39][40][41] is conservative. By contrast, the newly proposed prescribed-time differentiators [42,43] realized significantly reduced slack between the actual settling time and the estimated UBST. The proposed PTESO (5) further reduces the conservatism compared to the differentiators [42,43].…”
Section: Prescribed-time Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…At present, few attempted to develop a prescribed-time extended state observer (PTESO). Rodrigo Aldana-Lopez et al [42] and Seeber et al [43] realized the prescribed-time stability (PTS) of robust exact differentiators, which are used to observe the first-order derivative of time-varying signals but cannot be treated as an ESO. Two prescribed-time state observers were proposed in [44,45] for unperturbed systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%