2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust energy-based model updating framework for random processes in dynamics: Application to shaking-table experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some exceptions exist, see [14][15][16][17], these updating methods are typically limited to linear(ized) systems [8,18]. Furthermore, these methods are based on expensive iterative sensitivity methods [16,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] or physically non-interpretable direct methods [21,[26][27][28]. Consequently, these techniques do not meet the four requirements for model updating for DTs as mentioned above and are thus not regarded as a viable solution to the problem considered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some exceptions exist, see [14][15][16][17], these updating methods are typically limited to linear(ized) systems [8,18]. Furthermore, these methods are based on expensive iterative sensitivity methods [16,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] or physically non-interpretable direct methods [21,[26][27][28]. Consequently, these techniques do not meet the four requirements for model updating for DTs as mentioned above and are thus not regarded as a viable solution to the problem considered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinct objective functions can be defined as a function of the reference quantities (e.g. [22,35]). In the present work, the reference quantities are the vibration modes of the structure obtained synthetically using a dedicated FEM module (more details in Section 4).…”
Section: Initiate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aerospace structures [14,15], topology optimization [16] and civil engineering [17,18,19,20]. It is worth mentioning that inherent uncertainties can also be considered in model updating [21,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although easy to implement, these techniques may lack of robustness as the identification result is strongly relying on (i) the choice of the a priori information that regularizes the inverse problem in Tikhonov's sense, and (ii) the calibration of the relative weights of the different terms contributing to the cost function [44]. An alternative then consists in using the concept of modified Constitutive Relation Error (mCRE) whose physics-based construction avoids the need for user-dependent knowledge [45][46][47]. This is the main driver behind its selection as a reference method for model updating in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%