2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2008.547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust End-to-End QoS Maintenance in Non-Contiguous OFDM Based Cognitive Radios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for the desired level of the blocking probability (e.g., < 0.15), the blocking is due to serving other RT users. This explains why the overall blocking probability is approximated as P B ≈ P B bs in the analysis, which is true for all practical values of the used parameters as can be calculated using (11) and (14) for P Bun and P B bs , respectively. Furthermore, there is an optimum number of the admitted RT users that maximizes the average number of the served RT users considering the required blocking probability threshold, which necessitates integrating the QoS provisioning with the call admission control.…”
Section: Numerical and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, for the desired level of the blocking probability (e.g., < 0.15), the blocking is due to serving other RT users. This explains why the overall blocking probability is approximated as P B ≈ P B bs in the analysis, which is true for all practical values of the used parameters as can be calculated using (11) and (14) for P Bun and P B bs , respectively. Furthermore, there is an optimum number of the admitted RT users that maximizes the average number of the served RT users considering the required blocking probability threshold, which necessitates integrating the QoS provisioning with the call admission control.…”
Section: Numerical and Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category investigates the Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol and opportunistic scheduling design, which can provide QoS for the SUs in different secondary network models [3]- [8]. The second category focuses on power allocation schemes that are aware of the QoS for different scenarios of CRNs [9]- [11]. The third category develops different call admission control and channel allocation schemes to guarantee certain QoS requirements of the SUs [12]- [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , T , we have an instance of Problem OP3 in which r t,REQ k is calculated using (16) with m CR,t equal to the number of available subchannels in slot t and m(t, t + T k,i − 1) can be estimated as discussed in Sect. 3.2.…”
Section: Op3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16], the average rate of the CRU in a single user case is maintained and the rate variance is minimized, subject to power constraints. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published work on QoS provisioning for realtime applications in OFDM-based CR systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, to the best of authors' knowledge, there are few studies on quality of service (QoS) support in OFDMA-based CR systems. The QoS designs in [7,8] for CR systems only considered non-real-time applications. Up to now, the study on the spectrum underlay sharing is also sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%