2008
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com:20060172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust end-to-end loss differentiation scheme for transport control protocol over wired/wireless networks

Abstract: The authors propose a robust end-to-end loss differentiation scheme to identify the packet losses because of congestion for transport control protocol (TCP) connections over wired/wireless networks. The authors use the measured round trip time (RTT) values to determine whether the cause of packet loss is because of the congestion over wired path or regular bit errors over wireless paths. The classification should be as accurate as possible to achieve high throughput and maximum fairness for the TCP connections… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some loss differentiation schemes such as Westwood [8], JTCP [9], and RELDS [10] have been proposed to detect wireless FRRs/RTOs. These schemes distinguish wireless losses from congestion losses, and let TCP avoid reducing unnecessarily its transmission rate when any of FRRs/RTOs are triggered by wireless losses.…”
Section: Related Study and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some loss differentiation schemes such as Westwood [8], JTCP [9], and RELDS [10] have been proposed to detect wireless FRRs/RTOs. These schemes distinguish wireless losses from congestion losses, and let TCP avoid reducing unnecessarily its transmission rate when any of FRRs/RTOs are triggered by wireless losses.…”
Section: Related Study and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some loss differentiation schemes such as Westwood [8], JTCP [9], and RELDS [10] have been proposed to differentiate wireless losses from congestion losses. Other schemes such as Eifel [11][12][13], F-RTO [14,15], and STODER [16] have been suggested to remove the unnecessary retransmissions by detecting spurious FRRs/RTOs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the two conditions are satisfied, it ascribes the packet loss to congestion; otherwise, it assumes it as wireless losses. Lim and Jang [3] suggested a robust end-to-end loss differentiation scheme (RELDS) to precisely discriminate between congestion losses and wireless losses. This scheme employs a moving threshold which is defined as a function of minimum and sample RTT.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms [1], [3]- [5], [12] distinguish the cause of packet losses based on information available at Transport Layer. Although these schemes can identify some of the packet losses due to wireless transmission errors as wireless losses, their accuracy is not high as much as we expect, and these schemes cannot avoid sacrificing the accuracy of congestion loss discrimination by misclassifying congestion losses as wireless losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is considered inappropriate as the channel capacity in wired network in this study is very limited. (Lim and Jang, 2008) proposed Indirect-TCP (I-TCP) that splits the connection on the wireless edge to protect TCP session from wireless media inconsistencies and losses. This results in two different flow and congestion controls in wired and wireless sections separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%