2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsc.2012.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Dynamic Service Composition in Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [42], the authors present a graph-based formulation for modeling sensor In [43], authors present a distributed composition service to automate the re-organization process that can occur due to the inherit limitation of a WSN. …”
Section: Wireless Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [42], the authors present a graph-based formulation for modeling sensor In [43], authors present a distributed composition service to automate the re-organization process that can occur due to the inherit limitation of a WSN. …”
Section: Wireless Sensor Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dar et al [47] undertakes the scalability and dynamicity issues of very-large scale IoT systems to propose an orchestration/choreography for composing services of smart objects and business services. Graph-based modeling framework [42] formulates the process of sensor service composition to deal with the dynamicity of WSNs. Han 594 et al [50] propose a context-aware service composition to dynamically adapt the composite process to the changes in several types of context in a building environment.…”
Section: Service-oriented Middleware and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suppose a WSN is deployed as a support system for a disaster relief effort. A monitoring system configured in such a scenario might use audio and video feeds produced by other services to provide surveillance of the area 1 Research was sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.K. Ministry of Defence and was accomplished under Agreement Number W911NF-06-3-0001. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author(s) and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory, the U.S. Government, the U.K. Ministry of Defence or the U.K. Government.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The service configuration in such a scenario should not only consider input/output portability [1] but also other factors, such as energy cost and spatial relevancy of services to the area of interest. In such a scenario, services that are more relevant (e.g., have a larger sensing range in the mission area) are more useful than services that provide the same outputs but with lower relevancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%