2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2017.8206297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust distributed decision-making in robot swarms: Exploiting a third truth state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context it is shown that combining updating and pooling leads to faster convergence and better consensus than Bayesian updating alone. An alternative methodology exploits three-valued logic to combine both types of evidence [Crosscombe and Lawry, 2016] and has been effectively applied to distributed decision-making in swarm robotics [Crosscombe et al, 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context it is shown that combining updating and pooling leads to faster convergence and better consensus than Bayesian updating alone. An alternative methodology exploits three-valued logic to combine both types of evidence [Crosscombe and Lawry, 2016] and has been effectively applied to distributed decision-making in swarm robotics [Crosscombe et al, 2017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the research community continues to make the case for applying swarm robotics to real-world problems, it is important to identify whether the proposed solutions can perform well in complex environments. Previously it has been shown that both the robustness and scalability of current approaches suffer in the presence of noisy and complex environments, for example in the weighted voter model (Crosscombe et al 2017), with few models since having attempted to address these problems (Lawry et al 2019;Lee et al 2018b). So far we have shown that using our approach agents can learn an accurate ordering of n = 10 options and that the model is robust to high levels of noise under certain conditions, i.e.…”
Section: Scalability Of Collective Preference Learningmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This limitation is often due to their having been inspired by, or even attempting to model directly, the solutions found in natural systems such as the nest site selection behaviours of social insects (Seeley and Buhrman 2001;Britton et al 2002;Sumpter and Pratt 2009). Recently, however, we have seen increased interest in developing models that move us closer to the goal of deploying robot swarms for real-world applications, for example by proposing models for collective learning which consider more complex environments as well as their robustness to the presence of noise or error (Crosscombe et al 2017;Lee et al 2018b).…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the AR DOME, one could already implement decision making algorithms [30], synchronised signaling [31], or patterning [32]. In the future, we aim to provide other modes of augmented communication, including depositing information (in this case light) in the environment (i.e.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%