2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1077-2014(03)00020-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust digital image watermarking method against geometrical attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared with other methods more robustness and watermark embedding capacity are noted. In addition, when compared with [19], [20], this method proved its efficiency for the high amount of embedded data and a better robustness against different geometrical attacks As shown in Fig. 9, our proposed algorithm is highly more robust to JPEG compression when compared with different well known algorithms in the DCT and spatial domains such as Kutter, Cox, Koch, Langelaar, Bruyndonckx, and Frifirich algorithms [21], [22], [24]- [26].…”
Section: ) Jpeg Compression Attackmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…When compared with other methods more robustness and watermark embedding capacity are noted. In addition, when compared with [19], [20], this method proved its efficiency for the high amount of embedded data and a better robustness against different geometrical attacks As shown in Fig. 9, our proposed algorithm is highly more robust to JPEG compression when compared with different well known algorithms in the DCT and spatial domains such as Kutter, Cox, Koch, Langelaar, Bruyndonckx, and Frifirich algorithms [21], [22], [24]- [26].…”
Section: ) Jpeg Compression Attackmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Correlation [15] is a measure of similarity of two signals as it depicts the amount by which the signal is deviated from the other signal. Normalized correlation is defined as follows: The low-pass filter [7] [8] used is a second-order Butterworth filter with cut-off frequency 11,025 Hz.…”
Section: Robustness Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reason for choosing block size as 8*8 is that 8*8 is also the size of JPEG blocks so the JPEG compression will affect each watermarked bit independently [5]. Size of the region is taken 128*128 as 128 is the exact divisor of 512 which is assumed to be the size of our test image in both the direction and also supports the concept of multiple watermarking [19] (1,2,3,4) for the sake of convenience. Host image I is divided into its component Images I R , I G , I B such that I R (i, j ), I G (i, j ) and I B (i, j ) are in the range [0 255] (where (i, j) is the pixel location such that 0 < i, j < = 512).…”
Section: Embedding Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watermarking can be classified in two broad categories based on their working domains; spatialdomain and frequency domain [4]. Watermarking in frequency domain shows more robustness but complexity and computational cost of forward and inverse transforms can be termed as their drawbacks Moreover in frequency domain methods the size * For correspondence of watermark is restricted to preserve the quality of watermarked image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%