2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.184513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust determination of the superconducting gap sign structure via quasiparticle interference

Abstract: Phase-sensitive measurements of the superconducting gap in Fe-based superconductors have proven more difficult than originally anticipated. While quasiparticle interference (QPI) measurements based on scanning tunneling spectroscopy are often proposed as defnitive tests of gap structure, the analysis typically relies on details of the model employed. Here we point out that the temperature dependence of momentum-integrated QPI data can be used to identify gap sign changes in a qualitative way, and present an il… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

9
81
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(47 reference statements)
9
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…for a weak scatterer, and the structure of this result is universal in the sense that it does not depend qualitatively on the strength of the scattering and the details of the electronic structure 24 . Here ∆ 1 and ∆ 2 are the two gaps associated with the two bands, U is a scalar scattering potential, A represents an area in q-space containing gap-sign-changing scattering vectors, and ρ(q, E) represents the FT-QPI, which is the FT of the spatial map of the differential conductivity g (r, E).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…for a weak scatterer, and the structure of this result is universal in the sense that it does not depend qualitatively on the strength of the scattering and the details of the electronic structure 24 . Here ∆ 1 and ∆ 2 are the two gaps associated with the two bands, U is a scalar scattering potential, A represents an area in q-space containing gap-sign-changing scattering vectors, and ρ(q, E) represents the FT-QPI, which is the FT of the spatial map of the differential conductivity g (r, E).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Probes based on Josephson loops with π-contacts, instead of providing a qualitative test, offer only a quantitative probe, since all possible junctions have currents arising from various Fermi surface sheets corresponding to both same-sign and oppositesign order parameters 21,22 . Quasiparticle interference (QPI) due to scattering from vortex cores is, in principle, phase-sensitive, but the interpretation requires specific models of the superconducting states 23,24 . The technique of identifying bound states formed at a non-magnetic impurity by means of scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) is more promising, and straightforward to measure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations