2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust design optimization (RDO) of thermoelectric generator system using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the NSGA-II algorithm has been used extensively in the area of NN optimization [ 33 ], Design optimization [ 34 , 35 ], Network optimization [ 36 ] and so forth. Considering the strong precedence and use cases, we use NSGA-II as a tool for optimizing our multi-objective problem in this research work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the NSGA-II algorithm has been used extensively in the area of NN optimization [ 33 ], Design optimization [ 34 , 35 ], Network optimization [ 36 ] and so forth. Considering the strong precedence and use cases, we use NSGA-II as a tool for optimizing our multi-objective problem in this research work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows the complete process of NSGA-II [ 47 ]. Compared with the previous generation MOO evolutionary algorithm NSGA, the NSGA-II mainly makes the following three improvements: A new algorithm for fast non-dominant sorting is added, which greatly reduces the computational complexity.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of performance indicators of heat engines increases, it is necessary to obtain global optimization solutions of several objective functions when optimizing the performance of the heat engines. Compared with the NSGA, the improved multi-objective optimization (MOO) algorithm (NSGA-II) has a faster running speed and better solution set, so it is the first choice of the MOO algorithm [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. Many scholars have applied NSGA-II to the performance optimizations of heat engines and then used several MOO decision-making methods to choose the optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the temperature loss between TEM leg-1 and TEM leg-2 is equivalent to Ktem/Kp for the materials (Bi2Te3, Al2O3, and Graphite). The loss to thermal conductance of 1/Ktem and 1/Kp is shown in the [7,11,12,33,35,38,44,54]. Likewise for 2 nd stage of TEG are optimized by decision making methods such as fuzzy, LINMAP and TOPSIS [9,18,40,43].…”
Section: Matlab Optimization In Thermoelectric Devicementioning
confidence: 99%