2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2013.6647376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust design optimization of permanent magnet synchronous machine utilizing genetic and Taguchi's algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Taguchi robust design method has been widely used for improving robustness of the target response by considering uncontrollable noise factors such as manufacturing tolerances, temperature variation, etc. [13,14,16]. Taguchi robust design determines the robustness by using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) which is the robustness index expressed by the mean and standard deviation of the response.…”
Section: Robust Optimal Design Of the Ocaf Using Hybrid Response Surfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Taguchi robust design method has been widely used for improving robustness of the target response by considering uncontrollable noise factors such as manufacturing tolerances, temperature variation, etc. [13,14,16]. Taguchi robust design determines the robustness by using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) which is the robustness index expressed by the mean and standard deviation of the response.…”
Section: Robust Optimal Design Of the Ocaf Using Hybrid Response Surfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the regression equations of the statistic values of the OCAF are derived from the analysis of the response surface method as below: µ Φ g = 0.06781 + 0.002929 × MT + 0.002367 × MPA + 0.000102 × MT × MPA (12) σ Φ g = 0.001442 − 0.000021 × MT + 0.000048 MPA − 0.000001 × MT × MPA (13) Z Φ g = −48.35 + 1.703 × MT + 0.8133 × MPA + 0.02842 × MT × MPA (14) SNR Φ g = 0.3697 + 0.2633 × MT + 0.1282 × MPA − 0.000006 × MT × MPA (15) In the above equations, there are no quadratic terms because we used two levels of the MT and MPA as can be seen in Table 5; we should use three levels of a factor to include the quadratic terms of the factor. However, we think that the quadratic terms of MT and MPA have ignorable effect on the OCAF as can be seen in Figure 6.…”
Section: Control Factor Noise Factor Statistics Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the coil temperature is an objective function, the smaller-the-better (STB) response is chosen among the loss functions. The loss function is presented as (1) because the coil temperatures should be small [10][11][12][13][14]:…”
Section: Quality Loss Function and Sn Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of robust design deal with various responses [12][13][14][15][16][17], and the residual induction according to manufacturing tolerance is studied in [18][19][20]. However, the robust design is not conducted considering the magnetic unbalance caused by asymmetry of each pole.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%