2005
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2005.847308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Design of Electrostatic Separation Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass of middling products is only 3.7 g (mean) and decreases 73% and 59% compared with groups 1 and 2, respectively. In general, this is always used as a criterion to estimate the performance of the separation process [8,14]. The recovery of metals is 28.7 g (mean), increases 34% and 22% compared with groups 1 and 2, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mass of middling products is only 3.7 g (mean) and decreases 73% and 59% compared with groups 1 and 2, respectively. In general, this is always used as a criterion to estimate the performance of the separation process [8,14]. The recovery of metals is 28.7 g (mean), increases 34% and 22% compared with groups 1 and 2, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it still faces some problems about robustness. It is sensitive to some noise factors, such as the material characteristics, the granule size and the ambient condition and leads to a low efficiency eventually [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic separation is nowadays the subject of further research, especially on its optimization using different mathematical methods [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…voltage level and rotating speed, were defined as system factor due to the possibility of improving system performance significantly. On the other hand, environmental conditions, characteristic variation of samples, and any source of natural occurrences were considered random factors [14]. We propose to having a robust design to reduce the variations of the process conditions caused by the random factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixtures of granules that fall to the middle tank are classified as middling product (M) and used as an indicator of recovery efficiency. In the robust design, voltage level and roller rotation speed were defined as system factors [14], whereas the water content and size of biowaste granules were selected as random factors. Water content in biowaste decides its conductivity and likelihood to be moved to the right-most tank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%