2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0349-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust design modeling with correlated quality characteristics using a multicriteria decision framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using RSM, Huele and Engel 44 introduce a method of tolerance design for parameters, allowing non-normally distributed noise factors. Finally, the consideration of multiple quality characteristics in the context of RD has been studied in Govindaluri and Cho 45,46 and Kovach and Cho [47][48][49][50] .…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Using RSM, Huele and Engel 44 introduce a method of tolerance design for parameters, allowing non-normally distributed noise factors. Finally, the consideration of multiple quality characteristics in the context of RD has been studied in Govindaluri and Cho 45,46 and Kovach and Cho [47][48][49][50] .…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One of the approaches for solving multiresponse problem based on programming is an approach proposed by Govindaluri and Cho (2007). They used programming to develop the multiresponse optimisation method based on Tchebycheff distance and relative importance (weights) of responses that are specified based on the customer requirements.…”
Section: Multiresponse Optimisation Based On Goal-programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] the strengths of two popular loss function-based methods [8,9] are combined. Other contributions introduced in the last decade are the mean squared error [10], weighted signal-to-noise ratio [11], PCA-based grey relational analysis [12], weighted principal component [13], capability index [14], patient rule induction [15], design envelopment analysis [16], compromise programming [17], goal programming [18], physical programming [19,20], bayesian probability [21], weighted Tchebycheff formulations [22], modified "-constraint method [23,24]. Relationships and differences among several criteria are highlighted in [25].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%