2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust decentralised control strategies for large-scale web handling systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weighting function W u is used to avoid large control signals and the weighting function W t increases the roll-off at high frequencies. To specify independently the tracking performance and robustness to perturbations, a two degree of freedom H ∞ controller can be used Benlatreche, et al, 2006). To take into account the inherent system nonlinearities and some constant values (such as static friction in roller bearings) in the control strategy, model based feedforward signals have been added to the control signals.…”
Section: Reduced Order Centralized Control With Feedforwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The weighting function W u is used to avoid large control signals and the weighting function W t increases the roll-off at high frequencies. To specify independently the tracking performance and robustness to perturbations, a two degree of freedom H ∞ controller can be used Benlatreche, et al, 2006). To take into account the inherent system nonlinearities and some constant values (such as static friction in roller bearings) in the control strategy, model based feedforward signals have been added to the control signals.…”
Section: Reduced Order Centralized Control With Feedforwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with a high number of actuators and sensors, and it is not suitable to use a centralized controller for such processes. An alternative solution is to use semi-decentralized control: the global system is split into several subsystems controlled independently by its own controller (Knittel, 2003;Benlatreche, et al, 2006). Recently, multivariable decentralized control strategies have been proposed for industrial metal transport systems (Geddes, and Postlethwaite, 1998;Grimble, and Hearns, 1999), and for elastic web with H ∞ controllers (Featherstone, et al, 2000;Knittel, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For system (9), each EESM can track its desired speed and maintain coordination performance with other motors if there exist a symmetric and positive-definite matrix 5 On the basis of (13), (19), and (21), the following equation is obtained. 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 14 15 24 25 2 2 44 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 41 42 45 51 2 …”
Section: T T T T T T Pe E P a P Pa K B P Pbk Q P Pqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], an optimal synchronization for high-precision motion system was designed by introducing coupling and synchronization factors into the synchronization error. Many other control strategies have been adopted in this field, and they include adaptive control [7]- [9], fuzzy control [10], [11], electronic line-shafting control [12], [13], robust control [14]- [19], neural network control [20], gain-scheduled control [21], and model-free control [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%