2016
DOI: 10.4271/2016-01-0961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust, Cost-Optimal and Compliant Engine and Aftertreatment Operation using Air-path Control and Tailpipe Emission Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other works [11][12][13][14], the benefit of heating the ATS is approximated offline. This approximation is then used by the supervisory controller when determining the optimal engine operation online.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other works [11][12][13][14], the benefit of heating the ATS is approximated offline. This approximation is then used by the supervisory controller when determining the optimal engine operation online.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], a feedforward controller based on Pontryagin's minimum principle was implemented, whereby a heuristic method was used to determine the equivalence factor for the ATS heating. In [12], this controller was extended to include feedback control based on the measured tailpipe NO x emissions. In [13], dynamic programming was used to determine the optimal operation for several missions offline.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve low fuel consumption (or, equivalently, low CO 2 emissions) and low pollutant emissions, the actuators of a Diesel engine and its exhaust-gas aftertreatment system (ATS) have to be optimised and accurately controlled. A common approach to optimise the operation of the overall system is to use a so-called supervisory control strategy (Cloudt & Willems, 2011; van Dooren, Amstutz, & Onder, 2022;Ramachandran et al, 2016). Such a strategy is based on optimal control theory (Geering, 2007) and aims to exploit the synergy between engine and ATS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second group of publications, e.g., Jeong et al (2019), Mentink, van den Nieuwenhof, Kupper, Willems, and Kooijman (2015), Ramachandran et al (2016), Wasserburger, Hametner, and Didcock (2019), does evaluate the emissions of each time window of the MAW method, but only after designing and testing a robust (and therefore conservative) control strategy, the tuning of which is typically based on statistical methods. Although these strategies fulfil the requirements of the RDE legislation, it is unknown whether, and even unlikely that, they achieve minimum fuel consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%