2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/allerton.2019.8919695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Convergence Analysis of Three-Operator Splitting

Abstract: Operator splitting methods solve composite optimization problems by breaking them into smaller sub-problems that can be solved sequentially or in parallel. In this paper, we propose a unified framework for certifying both linear and sublinear convergence rates for three-operator splitting (TOS) method under a variety of assumptions about the objective function. By viewing the algorithm as a dynamical system with feedback uncertainty (the oracle model), we leverage robust control theory to analyze the worst-cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aragón-Artacho and Torregrosa-Belén proved convergence of the DYS iteration over a wider range of stepsizes [1], Dao and Phan analyzed a modified version of DYS iterations [12], and Pedregosa analyzed sublinear convergence rates of DYS iterations [25], but they did not analyze linear rates of convergence. Ryu, Taylor, Bergeling, and Giselsson [30] and Wang, Fazlyab, Chen, and Preciado [35] formulated the problem of computing tight contraction factors as SDPs using the performance estimation problem (PEP) and incremental quadratic constraint (IQC) approaches, but these are numerical results, not analytic convergence proofs in the classical sense. The only linear convergence rates of DYS iterations are those presented in the arXiv version of the original DYS paper [13].…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aragón-Artacho and Torregrosa-Belén proved convergence of the DYS iteration over a wider range of stepsizes [1], Dao and Phan analyzed a modified version of DYS iterations [12], and Pedregosa analyzed sublinear convergence rates of DYS iterations [25], but they did not analyze linear rates of convergence. Ryu, Taylor, Bergeling, and Giselsson [30] and Wang, Fazlyab, Chen, and Preciado [35] formulated the problem of computing tight contraction factors as SDPs using the performance estimation problem (PEP) and incremental quadratic constraint (IQC) approaches, but these are numerical results, not analytic convergence proofs in the classical sense. The only linear convergence rates of DYS iterations are those presented in the arXiv version of the original DYS paper [13].…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%