2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(01)00040-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust controller design for uncertain systems with variable time delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Caused by the time required to transport mass, energy or information, processing time or by the accumulation of time lags in a number of simple dynamic systems connected in series, dead times, or time delays severely affect the performance of the feedback control loops, producing a decrease in system phase and also giving rise to a non-rational transfer function of the system, making them more difficult to analyse and control [20]. Diverse examples of stochastic time delays in practical engineering applications can be found in the control of recycling stream processes [29], pasteurization processes [30], fluid systems [31], [32] and in network congestion control systems etc [33]. As for FOPDT process, stochastic time delay may obey some probabilistic distribution within some limited region Ω [34] like normal distribution θ ∼ N (μ, σ 2 ).…”
Section: B Stochastic Parameter Uncertainty In Time Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caused by the time required to transport mass, energy or information, processing time or by the accumulation of time lags in a number of simple dynamic systems connected in series, dead times, or time delays severely affect the performance of the feedback control loops, producing a decrease in system phase and also giving rise to a non-rational transfer function of the system, making them more difficult to analyse and control [20]. Diverse examples of stochastic time delays in practical engineering applications can be found in the control of recycling stream processes [29], pasteurization processes [30], fluid systems [31], [32] and in network congestion control systems etc [33]. As for FOPDT process, stochastic time delay may obey some probabilistic distribution within some limited region Ω [34] like normal distribution θ ∼ N (μ, σ 2 ).…”
Section: B Stochastic Parameter Uncertainty In Time Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it is Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control New Orleans, LA, USA, Dec. [12][13][14]2007 FrA16.6 well-known that when significant uncertainty exists either within the time-delay or the rational part of the system model, SPC may be very sensitive to the mismatch between the inner-loop model and actual system model [6]. In [12], an alternative robust PC design has been proposed using linear matrix inequality (LMI) concept and and H ∞ theory.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Smith predictor is considered an effective method to remove the time delay effect in many applications, where valid linear model are available [4,9,10] and at the time the method was proposed, powerful non-linear modelling, computing and control techniques were not sufficiently matured. The ability to map non-linearities using neural networks [11,121 and to integrate highspeed data processing make it feasible to consider a neural network predictor in the control loop to improve positioning accuracy and response speed of the pneumatic servo-actuator in this study.…”
Section: Normenclature C Output Of a Neuron D(z)mentioning
confidence: 99%