2021
DOI: 10.1108/jopp-06-2020-0053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust contractor evaluation criteria classification for modern technology public construction projects

Abstract: Purpose The emergence of massive modern technology construction projects is seen to be a real occurrence in Pakistan’s construction industry, which in turn demands a better and systematic way of undertaking the project. Hence, this requires capable contractors to perform the task. A plethora of research studies are carried in the past three decades on the identification of evaluation criteria of contractor’s selection, but the road of modern technology construction projects is still unpaved. Design/methodolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A larger value of FL signals a closer relationship and offers a higher impact. A value of 0.5 and above is contemplated for a significant variable (Khoso et al, 2021a;Phogat & Gupta, 2019). A great variety of rotation methods are available in SPSS which mainly depend on the type of data, such as interrelationships.…”
Section: Evaluation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A larger value of FL signals a closer relationship and offers a higher impact. A value of 0.5 and above is contemplated for a significant variable (Khoso et al, 2021a;Phogat & Gupta, 2019). A great variety of rotation methods are available in SPSS which mainly depend on the type of data, such as interrelationships.…”
Section: Evaluation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the many objectives of EFA in the past is to rank the factors (groups of subsets), where the factor indicates the major criteria and subsets means the sub-criteria. For this persistence, SS that may interchangeably use as factor score employed in various studies cited by DiStefano et al (2009) and Khoso et al (2021a). The factor with the most substantial value is positioned at the apex in the hierarchy, and the SS or FS values epitomize each group's essence (Benson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Evaluation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction industry, likewise several other industries, is starting to embrace and engage with new technology. It is further assumed that modern technologies are paving their deeper path in the construction industry with the recent technological developments (Khoso et al, 2021). It can be seen with the widespread adoption in Building Information Model (BIM), 3D Modelling, Internet of Things, and many more.…”
Section: Smart Contracts In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enshassi et al (2009) relate unavailability of resources, delays, leadership problems, escalation in material prices, inexperienced staff, poor equipment and, materials with project performance. Besides, Khoso et al (2021aKhoso et al ( , 2021b relate project performance to contractor selection issues in public projects.…”
Section: A Review Of Project Performance Poor Performance Measurement In Construction Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%