The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23192-1_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Contact Lens Detection Using Local Phase Quantization and Binary Gabor Pattern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hand-crafted approaches use various image descriptors to calculate image features, which are used to distinguish between authentic irises and artifacts typically through the use of Support Vector Machine classifiers. Popular techniques used in calculation of PAD-related iris image features are Binarized Statistical Image Features (BSIF) [16], Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [12], Binary Gabor Patterns (BGP) [17], Local Contrast-Phase Descriptor (LCPD) [18], Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) [19], Scale Invariant Descriptor (SID) [20], Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and DAISY [21], Locally Uniform Comparison Image Descriptor (LUCID) and CENsus TRansform hISTogram (CENTRIST) [22], Weber Local Descriptor (WLD) [18], Wavelet Packet Transform (WPT) [23] or image quality descriptors proposed by Galbally et al [24]. Instead of "hand-crafting" effective feature extractors, one may also benefit from recently popular data-driven approaches that learn directly from the data how to process and classify iris images to solve the PAD task [21], [25]- [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hand-crafted approaches use various image descriptors to calculate image features, which are used to distinguish between authentic irises and artifacts typically through the use of Support Vector Machine classifiers. Popular techniques used in calculation of PAD-related iris image features are Binarized Statistical Image Features (BSIF) [16], Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [12], Binary Gabor Patterns (BGP) [17], Local Contrast-Phase Descriptor (LCPD) [18], Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) [19], Scale Invariant Descriptor (SID) [20], Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and DAISY [21], Locally Uniform Comparison Image Descriptor (LUCID) and CENsus TRansform hISTogram (CENTRIST) [22], Weber Local Descriptor (WLD) [18], Wavelet Packet Transform (WPT) [23] or image quality descriptors proposed by Galbally et al [24]. Instead of "hand-crafting" effective feature extractors, one may also benefit from recently popular data-driven approaches that learn directly from the data how to process and classify iris images to solve the PAD task [21], [25]- [29].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods include detection of fake representations of irises (paper printouts, textured contact lenses, prosthetic eyes, displays), or a non-conformant use of an actual eye. The most popular techniques used in iris PAD use various image texture descriptors (Binarized Statistical Image Features (BSIF) [16], Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [6], Binary Gabor Patterns (BGP) [17], Local Contrast-Phase Descriptor (LCPD) [11], Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) [28], Scale Invariant Descriptor (SID) [10], Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and DAISY [21], Weber Local Descriptor (WLD) [11], or Wavelet Packet Transform (WPT) [2]), image quality descriptors [8], or deep-learning-based techniques [19,12,21,23]. If hardware adaptations are possible one may consider multi-spectral analysis [31] or estimation of three-dimensional iris features [20,13] for PAD.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Presentation Attack Detection In Iris Recomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doyel et al [10] ensembled 14 classifiers together to conduct three class lens detection problem and achieved an accuracy of 97%. Lovish et al [12] proposed a method based on Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) and Binary Gabor Patterns (BGP) for detecting cosmetic lens. Lee et al [11] proposed a hardware based solution to distinguish between a real and fabricated iris image based on purkinje image formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%