2017
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2017.2704160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Constrained Attitude Control of Spacecraft Formation Flying in the Presence of Disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature [29][30][31]45,[49][50][51] in the spacecraft field reports various kinematic models to describe the spacecraft motion's behavior. Derivation of the most reported model 31,43 is as follows.…”
Section: The Attitude Dynamics Of the Spacecraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [29][30][31]45,[49][50][51] in the spacecraft field reports various kinematic models to describe the spacecraft motion's behavior. Derivation of the most reported model 31,43 is as follows.…”
Section: The Attitude Dynamics Of the Spacecraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the effectiveness of a synchronization algorithm is measured by its convergence time. Over the last decades, a variety of SFF attitude synchronization algorithms has been developed to satisfy SFF attitude synchronization requirements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, most existing results only show asymptotic convergence, which is slow and high-energy consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the existing literature, most of the 6-DOF SFF control designs assume a leader-follower architecture, such as [1,14]. This type of control is centralized, whereby increasing the number of followers, the leader controller structure becomes more complicated, and the loss of leader will result in mission failure [25]. In contrast, a decentralized controller is generated according to each follower's desired states, which is superior in terms of robustness and reliability [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a decentralized controller is generated according to each follower's desired states, which is superior in terms of robustness and reliability [26]. The decentralized virtual structure method, where each follower's tracking errors are measured with respect to a virtual leader, has been used to solve the control problem of SFF involving a mass of spacecraft in [5,18,25]. For a 6-DOF SFF, besides the requirement of absolute attitude and position tracking, it also requires the followers to maintain relative attitudes and an accurate geometric configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%