2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2012.05901
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Consistent Video Depth Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these methods lack geometric constraints and scale ambiguity in the learning process. Recently, a combination with geometric constraint depth estimation methods have been proposed [10,11,[32][33][34]. For example, the average depth varies greatly between adjacent frames when there are limited image pixel movement ranges, relative estimated poses, and inconsistent reference frames between the poses [15].…”
Section: Self-supervised Monocular Depth Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these methods lack geometric constraints and scale ambiguity in the learning process. Recently, a combination with geometric constraint depth estimation methods have been proposed [10,11,[32][33][34]. For example, the average depth varies greatly between adjacent frames when there are limited image pixel movement ranges, relative estimated poses, and inconsistent reference frames between the poses [15].…”
Section: Self-supervised Monocular Depth Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods lead to the dependence on sparse LiDAR data, which are relatively expensive. A recent trend in depth estimation methods involves traditional SLAM [9], which could provide an accurate sparse point cloud, learning to predict monocular depth and odometry in a self-supervised manner [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%