2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21072431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Coarse-to-Fine Registration Scheme for Mobile Laser Scanner Point Clouds Using Multiscale Eigenvalue Statistic-Based Descriptor

Abstract: To overcome the drawbacks of pairwise registration for mobile laser scanner (MLS) point clouds, such as difficulty in searching the corresponding points and inaccuracy registration matrix, a robust coarse-to-fine registration method is proposed to align different frames of MLS point clouds into a common coordinate system. The method identifies the correct corresponding point pairs from the source and target point clouds, and then calculates the transform matrix. First, the performance of a multiscale eigenvalu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the model achieves a registration success rate improvement of over 20% in situations with low overlap. Fu et al [32] introduced a novel point cloud registration framework based on depth map matching. They developed a module that utilizes depth map matching to compute a soft correspondence matrix, and introduced a transformer-based method to generate edges for graph construction.…”
Section: Methods Based On Point Cloud Comparison With a Standard Poin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the model achieves a registration success rate improvement of over 20% in situations with low overlap. Fu et al [32] introduced a novel point cloud registration framework based on depth map matching. They developed a module that utilizes depth map matching to compute a soft correspondence matrix, and introduced a transformer-based method to generate edges for graph construction.…”
Section: Methods Based On Point Cloud Comparison With a Standard Poin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registration performance is evaluated in terms of time performance and registration accuracy. The two aspects are commonly adopted by many researchers [15,21,22,44]. The registration accuracy includes rotation error r e and translation error t e , can be calculated by comparing the transformation matrix obtained by the registration method with the ground-truth.…”
Section: A Experimental Datasets and Evaluation Metric 1) Experimenta...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods calculate the transformation parameters by establishing the point correspondences between source and target point clouds using keypoints and their local shape descriptors. First, some keypoints are selected from the original point cloud by the keypoints extraction methods, such as 2.5D scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) [16], Harris 3D [17], and intrinsic shape signatures (ISS) [18], to accelerate the speed of registration process; Next, the local shape descriptors of the keypoints are calculated, for example, point feature histogram (PFH) [19], fast point feature histogram (FPFH) [20], multiscale eigenvalues statistic (MEVS) [21], feature descriptor vector (FDV) [22], binary shape context (BSC) [6], local voxelized structure (LoVS) [23], and rotational contour signature (RCS) [24]; Third, by comparing the similarity of the local shape descriptors in the feature space, the corresponding points are identified; Finally, the transformation matrix between pairwise point clouds are estimated by the point correspondences. The abovementioned registration strategy is called descriptor-based method, it can well align pairwise point clouds with large overlap, but it is easy to fail when the overlap is small or there are a lot of noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach to the rough classification of mobile laser scanning data based on raster image processing techniques was presented by H ůlková [12], which is based on the specified criteria (e.g., in height, size, position) of the objects in the raster image to judge their categories. Another knowledge-based method is to design shape descriptors to find the specific category, which is widely used in the classification and registration process of point clouds [13,14]. A pairwise 3D shape context descriptor was proposed to accurately extract street light poles from nonground points, which was capable of performing partial object matching and retrieval [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%