2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2016.0430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust closed loop reference MRAC with PI compensator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, MRC can guarantee asymptotic tracking performance. 47 The suggested MRC method contains three main elements, namely, wind turbine model, reference model, and a PI controller 36 as shown in Figure 10. The reference model represents the desired response of the control system.…”
Section: Model Reference Adaptive Control (Mrc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, MRC can guarantee asymptotic tracking performance. 47 The suggested MRC method contains three main elements, namely, wind turbine model, reference model, and a PI controller 36 as shown in Figure 10. The reference model represents the desired response of the control system.…”
Section: Model Reference Adaptive Control (Mrc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using an adaptive technique with the traditional PI control, the nonlinearities of the system can be compensated. In addition, MRC can guarantee asymptotic tracking performance 47 …”
Section: Speed Controller Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in previous works, [6][7][8] the classical theory of MRAC is applied to different control systems. In previous works, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] MRAC is further employed to ameliorate the tracking performance of a control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a great deal of effort has been devoted by researchers focusing on potential ways of improving the transient performance (Cao and Hovakimyan, 2008; Datta and Ioannou, 1994; Dey et al, 2016; Gibson et al, 2012, 2013; Ioannou and Kokotovic, 1984; Krstić et al, 1993; Lee and Huh, 1997; Narendra and Annaswamy, 1987; Nguyen, 2012; Parks, 1966; Stepanyan and Krishnakumar, 2010, 2012; Sun, 1993; Sun et al, 2016; Xin et al, 2012; Yucelen and Haddad, 2013). Some of these efforts include: modified standard adaptive law (Datta and Ioannou, 1994), multiple models with switching control schemes (Narendra and Balakrishnan, 1997), L 1 adaptive control (Cao and Hovakimyan, 2008; Hovakimyan and Cao, 2010) and closed-loop reference MRAC (Gibson et al, 2012, 2013; Lee and Huh, 1997; Stepanyan and Krishnakumar, 2010, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first category, Datta and Ioannou (1994) introduced L 2 and L tracking error bound criteria to study the transient performance of MRAC schemes. In this work, a small tracking error is ensured with a high adaptation gain, which may lead to adverse effects, as discussed (Dey et al, 2016; Ioannou and Kokotovic, 1984; Yucelen and Haddad, 2013). Furthermore, a very high adaptation gain makes the differential equation of adaptive law stiff and may cause numerical instabilities (Ioannou et al, 2014), and may also excite unmodelled dynamics of the plant, leading to instability of the system (Ioannou and Sun, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%