2010
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2010.2051427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Class Similarity Measure for Traffic Sign Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ruta et al [26] proposed a sign recognition method based on similarity measurement learning from example pairs. Yuan et al [27] developed color global and local oriented edge magnitude pattern features for traffic sign description and applied an SVM for recognition.…”
Section: A Studies On Traffic Sign Detection and Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ruta et al [26] proposed a sign recognition method based on similarity measurement learning from example pairs. Yuan et al [27] developed color global and local oriented edge magnitude pattern features for traffic sign description and applied an SVM for recognition.…”
Section: A Studies On Traffic Sign Detection and Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the evaluation criteria used in [26], TP ("correctly detected") represents the percentage of the correctly detected testing samples in the reference data. "Partially detected" represents the percentage of the testing samples that are partially detected.…”
Section: ) Quantitative Assessment Of the Proposed Detection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a traffic sign detection algorithm using a novel application of maximally stable extremal regions (MSERs), and proved that the MSERs were robust to variations in both lighting and contrast. In addition, some recent systems utilize the sliding window paradigm [9], [10], [12] to detect traffic sign regions. For example, as presented in [10], the original image is resized by a scaling factor s i to obtain the image corresponding to the pyramid level i.…”
Section: A Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods employ machine learning to accommodate to the average appearance of a sign type. In contrast, Ruta et al [10] proposes to exploit similarities between the sample and reference images. Instead of using structural information, key feature counting is employed in [3], where signs are classified using a modified version of Bag of Words (BoW).…”
Section: Module 1: Single Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%