2002
DOI: 10.1177/07430402017003003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Circadian Rhythmicity of Per1 and Per2 Mutant Mice in Constant Light, and Dynamics of Per1 and Per2 Gene Expression under Long and Short Photoperiods

Abstract: The Per1 and Per2 genes are components of the mammalian circadian clock. Mutations in these genes alter phase resetting in response to a nocturnal light pulse, and Per2 mutant mice are known to become arrhythmic in constant darkness. We show that under constant light conditions, Per2 mutant mice exhibit robust activity rhythms as well as body temperature rhythms with a period length that is less than 24 h. In Per1 mutants, the period length of both activity and body temperature rhythms is longer than 24 h in c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
56
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…per1 induction remained unchanged, and thus produced mainly phase advances. This agrees with the studies of Albrecht et al (2001) and Steinlechner et al (2002) which show that per1 induction by light is important for phase advances and per2 induction by light is important of phase delays. In addition, phase advances and phase delays in the SCN appear to be regulated by different neurotransmitters (Ding et al, 1998).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…per1 induction remained unchanged, and thus produced mainly phase advances. This agrees with the studies of Albrecht et al (2001) and Steinlechner et al (2002) which show that per1 induction by light is important for phase advances and per2 induction by light is important of phase delays. In addition, phase advances and phase delays in the SCN appear to be regulated by different neurotransmitters (Ding et al, 1998).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is consistent in all species examined, regardless of whether the animals are reproductively photoperiodic [91,[97][98][99][100] or not [101][102][103]. The results on other clock genes, including Cry1, Cry2, Bmal1 and clock are less consistent, which could either reflect species difference (rat, Syrian hamster, Siberian hamster) or differences in photoperiodic history or condition [91,99,103].…”
Section: Effect Of Photoperiodssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Several authors have proposed that M and E might be represented by the differently phased transcription of SCN 'clock' genes, the cyclic expression of which are thought to underlie the autoregulatory feedback loops that constitute the core of the circadian oscillatory machinery (Daan et al 2001; see also Hastings & Herzog 2004 for a current review of circadian clock genes). Data on Period 1 (Per1) and Per2 expression patterns of mutant mice in different photoperiods suggest that the two genes might be anchored to morning and evening, respectively (Steinlechner et al 2002). It is not known if photoperiodic effects are a property of individual SCN cells, with their activities compressed and decompressed, or instead emerge from intercellular interactions, with the cells assuming variable phase relations as a function of day length.…”
Section: Photoperiodic Time Measurement (A) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%