2018
DOI: 10.3390/en11040862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Building Energy Load Forecasting Using Physically-Based Kernel Models

Abstract: Robust and accurate building energy load forecasting is important for helping building managers and utilities to plan, budget, and strategize energy resources in advance. With recent prevalent adoption of smart-meters in buildings, a significant amount of building energy consumption data became available. Many studies have developed physics-based white box models and data-driven black box models to predict building energy consumption; however, they require extensive prior knowledge about building system, need … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a hybrid method frequently requires long computation time because of the boundary advancement procedure and master information during the model improvement process [84]. There have been studies on hybrid methods that have focused on electrical consumption [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92], cooling and heating load [79,80,[93][94][95], energy consumption [96][97][98][99][100][101], thermal load [102], thermal response [103] and load demand [104]. Based on the aforementioned studies, a summary of their contributions and limitations is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: ] Yumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a hybrid method frequently requires long computation time because of the boundary advancement procedure and master information during the model improvement process [84]. There have been studies on hybrid methods that have focused on electrical consumption [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92], cooling and heating load [79,80,[93][94][95], energy consumption [96][97][98][99][100][101], thermal load [102], thermal response [103] and load demand [104]. Based on the aforementioned studies, a summary of their contributions and limitations is presented in Table 3.…”
Section: ] Yumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these models are developed for specific application areas such as building performance measurement and verification [14][15][16][17], building control [18][19][20] and demand-side management [21,22], whereas a significant number of studies are application agnostic. Literature demonstrates the capability of supervised ML algorithms such as artificial neural networks (ANN) [23], support vector machines (SVM) [24], decision trees [25,26], Gaussian processes [27][28][29] and nearest neighbours [30], among others, in developing reliable building load forecast models. In contrast to the physics based models, the ML based load forecast models require lesser amount of information from the buildings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their finding has shown the potential trend of growing improvement from the security index during 2015 to 2020, while the security degree and the corresponding alarm are found to be negative. Prakash, Xu, Rajagopal and Noh [16] presented a forecasting technique according to Gaussian process regression (GPR) to estimate an energy load, and the result reflected that the above method outperformed precisely as compared to other forecasting models. While Mehedintu, Sterpu and Soava [17] embarked on a study to estimate and predict the share of renewable energy consumption in final energy use within the European Union by 2020.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%