2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust biomarker identification in a two-class problem based on pairwise log-ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After transformation, the analysis then proceeds as if the data were absolute, but with a caveat: the interpretation of the results depends on the reference used. Second, the "pragmatic approach" analyzes pairwise log ratios directly; this type of analysis has been used to score important genes (15) and gene pairs (16,17), and to reduce the dimensionality of the data (17). This approach makes sense when the ratios themselves have some importance to the analyst.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After transformation, the analysis then proceeds as if the data were absolute, but with a caveat: the interpretation of the results depends on the reference used. Second, the "pragmatic approach" analyzes pairwise log ratios directly; this type of analysis has been used to score important genes (15) and gene pairs (16,17), and to reduce the dimensionality of the data (17). This approach makes sense when the ratios themselves have some importance to the analyst.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method rPLR has been developed for the identification of biomarkers using binary classification . The method rPLR is independent from the absolute values of the M variables because it uses the log ratios of all pairs ( j , k ) of the variables; for object i given by ln( x ij / x ik ) with j , k = 1, …, M .…”
Section: Data Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variable j with high importance for classification (a biomarker) will have considerably different elements 1 t jk and 2 t jk and tentatively smaller than t jk in T (for all k ). A statistic V j for estimation of the importance of variable j has been proposed as Vj=sum{}[]N10.25em1titalicjk0.5+N20.25em2titalicjk0.5/italicNtitalicjk0.52.25emsum0.25emfor0.25emk=1,,M. V j is approximately normally distributed, as well as the normalized version suggested for practical use: Vj*=[]Vjitalicmean()Vk/italicsd()Vk, with mean for the arithmetic mean, sd for the standard deviation, and k = 1, …, M . Big values for V * indicate a high variable importance (owing to the minus sign in the above equation); a reasonable cutoff is the 0.975 quantile.…”
Section: Data Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods above depend on a log-ratio transformation to standardize the comparison of one gene's expression (or one pair's coordination) with another. However, by comparing the variance of the log-ratios (VLR) within groups to the total VLR, we do not need a reference to estimate between-group differences in coordination [15,66]:…”
Section: Part 2b: Transformation-independent Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%