2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2013.6738848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust automatic ship tracking in harbours using active cameras

Abstract: Radar is commonly used to detect and track ships in maritime surveillance. Unfortunately the systems are costly and do not provide any visual information about the object's type. To complement the ship identity information given by a radar system, we propose a supplementary system using active visual cameras that can robustly detect and track ships in harbours. By combining a high-quality, non real-time robust object detector with a feature point tracker with low computational complexity, it is possible to tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frost et al [24] also applied the prior knowledge of ship shape to the level set segmentation algorithm to improve ship detection results. Loomans et al [25] integrated a multi-scale Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) detector and a hierarchical Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi (KLT) feature point tracker to track ships in the port, and achieved better detection and tracking effects. The above algorithm is not based on the background subtraction algorithm, but is based on the manually set ship characteristics for target detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frost et al [24] also applied the prior knowledge of ship shape to the level set segmentation algorithm to improve ship detection results. Loomans et al [25] integrated a multi-scale Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG) detector and a hierarchical Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi (KLT) feature point tracker to track ships in the port, and achieved better detection and tracking effects. The above algorithm is not based on the background subtraction algorithm, but is based on the manually set ship characteristics for target detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent approaches for maritime object detection [2,3,5,7,11,12,13,20,22,23] include object classification, background modelling, and saliency based methods. Detection based on classifiers using Haar [2], HOG [12] or CNN [3,7] features require substantial training data and are prone to overfitting on specific subsets of maritime objects. Modelling maritime backgrounds (i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches apply learning-based detectors (e.g. HOG [9], MACH [13]) to capture general shape and appearance information about objects. However, the detector would have to be exposed to a formidable training effort to capture all possible variations of vessels that might be observed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes a highly dynamic background whereby lighting and meteorological conditions severely influence the motion and appearance of waves, the variety of objects and their profiles (ranging from skiffs to fishing boats to oil tankers), varying object dynamics and appearance, and non-stationary sensors. Existing representative maritime trackers [5,6,7,8,9,13,14,15] are limited in that some rely on strong context, such as reliably detecting the horizon [6], require substantial training [9,13], operate on only a single modality (visible [6,8,9,13], thermal [5,14,15] with the exception of [7]), or are not robust to significant camera movement (for example, panning), or scale changes (including small targets) [7,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%