2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2018.8461224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Precise Vehicle Localization Based on Multi-Sensor Fusion in Diverse City Scenes

Abstract: We present a robust and precise localization system that achieves centimeter-level localization accuracy in disparate city scenes. Our system adaptively uses information from complementary sensors such as GNSS, LiDAR, and IMU to achieve high localization accuracy and resilience in challenging scenes, such as urban downtown, highways, and tunnels. Rather than relying only on LiDAR intensity or 3D geometry, we make innovative use of LiDAR intensity and altitude cues to significantly improve localization system a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
111
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the vehicle localization, two main methods are used in localization parameter estimations: filtering and optimization. Some common filtering methods are the Kalman Filter [3], the Extended Kalman Filter [36] and the particle filter [33,37]-Monte Carlo localization algorithm-which models the probability of sensor readings in order to predict and update the camera pose. In the works pertaining to optimization method [24], the pose estimation problem is viewed as a maximum likelihood (ML) formula where the sensor readings are compared with the map re-projection results to produce constraints, against which the camera pose is estimated iteratively.…”
Section: Data Association and Vehicle Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As for the vehicle localization, two main methods are used in localization parameter estimations: filtering and optimization. Some common filtering methods are the Kalman Filter [3], the Extended Kalman Filter [36] and the particle filter [33,37]-Monte Carlo localization algorithm-which models the probability of sensor readings in order to predict and update the camera pose. In the works pertaining to optimization method [24], the pose estimation problem is viewed as a maximum likelihood (ML) formula where the sensor readings are compared with the map re-projection results to produce constraints, against which the camera pose is estimated iteratively.…”
Section: Data Association and Vehicle Pose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides fusing the absolute localization information such as GNSS, it can also exploit the inter-frame motion information for smoothing. For example, IMU, vehicle dynamic constraints, and wheel odometry have all been integrated in the localization system as map-matching supplements [3,39]. These additional inter-frame constraints can be easily incorporated into the prediction step in the filtering framework.…”
Section: Integration Of Frame-to-frame Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All these lidar odometry algorithms can only output localization results at a frequency of less than 10 Hz, which might not be fast enough. Some recent approaches have started to fuse the lidar odometry with the IMU using either the Kalman Filter framework [2][3][4][5]17,18] or the factor graph representation [6,7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kümmerle et al [9] proposed a graphbased optimization approach, which treats the robot state as a node and the constraint gained from measurement as an edge. Wang et al [27] proposed a method to fuse the data collected by a multiple-sensor system that consists of RTK modules, a LiDAR sensor, and IMUs. However, the performance of such a system is subject to GPS single point positioning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%