2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2988267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Low-Overhead Hybrid Beamforming Design With Imperfect Phase Shifters in Multi-User Millimeter Wave Systems

Abstract: Phase shifters, often applied for analog beamforming in hybrid millimeter wave systems, are usually imperfect with random phase and gain errors brought by manufacture imperfections. Due to the uncertainty and nonreciprocity of random phase and gain errors, the digital precoder cannot eliminate the inter-user interference, which leads to system performance degradation. In our previous works [1], [2], we have analyzed the degradation of the achievable sum rate caused by imperfect phase shifters. The results show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, hardware impairment, Kalman beam-former, and multi-cell system have not been considered. In [34], a novel channel estimate and hybrid beam-forming design method while considering switches and non-ideal phase shifters have been considered. However, the multi-cell cell scenario has not been discussed in this research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hardware impairment, Kalman beam-former, and multi-cell system have not been considered. In [34], a novel channel estimate and hybrid beam-forming design method while considering switches and non-ideal phase shifters have been considered. However, the multi-cell cell scenario has not been discussed in this research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the two NNs are trained with the assumption of perfect phase shifters, there is mismatch between the perfect phase shifters in the offline training stage and the imperfect ones in practical implementation in the online deployment. Unlike the quantization error, random phase and gain errors are neither known nor reciprocal [42]. Therefore, it is meaningful to explore the robustness of the DL-based HBF NNs to imperfect phase shifters with random phase and gain errors.…”
Section: Network Structure Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is meaningful to explore the robustness of the DL-based HBF NNs to imperfect phase shifters with random phase and gain errors. According to [42], an imperfect phase shifter can be modeled as γe j(φ−δ) , where j = √ −1, φ is the ideal phase shift, δ denotes the phase error satisfying a Gaussian distribution with zero mean and variance σ 2 δ , i.e., δ ∼ N 0, σ 2 δ , and γ ∼ N 1, σ 2 γ denotes the non-ideal gain of the phase shifter. According to [43] and [44], a typical σ δ is set to 0.1rad and a typical σ γ is set to 0.2.…”
Section: Network Structure Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beamforming (BF) techniques play an important role in all communication and sensing systems. These are usually implemented with phase shifters (PS) network with constant amplitude constraint [1]. One of the implementation ways of the PSs is using digital technology with N b -bit resolution discrete phase [1], [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are usually implemented with phase shifters (PS) network with constant amplitude constraint [1]. One of the implementation ways of the PSs is using digital technology with N b -bit resolution discrete phase [1], [2]. The important specification of these PSs, which concern a system designer, is quantization error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%