In this chapter, I use figure hiding as a metaphor representing the processes of exclusion and suppression that critical mathematics education (CME) seeks to address. Figure hiding renders identities and modes of thought in mathematics education and mathematics education research invisible. CME has a commitment to addressing figure hiding by making visible what has been obscured and bringing to the center what has been marginalized. While the tentacles of CME research address different analytical domains, much of this work can be connected to the social isms that plague our world (e.g., sexism, racism, heterosexism, colonialism, capitalism, ableism, militarism, nationalism, religious sectarianism). However, the trend in CME research is to address these isms in silos, which does not reflect the compounded forms of oppression that many experience. I review CME studies that employ intersectionality as a way of analyzing the complexities of oppression. Intersectionality's limited use in CME research has been for identity-based analyses. I offer intersectional analysis as a strategy to extend intersectionality's power beyond identity toward more systemic analyses. I t is a rare occasion when Hollywood and mathematics education converge. It happened in late 2016 as the Hollywood publicity machine prepared for Hidden Figures (Gigliotti et al., 2016), a film adaptation of Margot Lee Shetterley's 2016 book. The film depicts the stories of Mary Jackson, Katherine Johnson, and Dorothy Vaughan, Black women mathematicians who worked for NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) and played key roles in support of John Glenn's 1962 orbit of the Earth. The film has prompted a surge in public discourse about girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), as corporations and 759039R REXXX10.