2021
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and efficient software for reference‐free genomic diversity analysis of genotyping‐by‐sequencing data on diploid and polyploid species

Abstract: Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is a widely used and cost-effective technique for obtaining large numbers of genetic markers from populations by sequencing regions adjacent to restriction cut sites. Although a standard reference-based pipeline can be followed to analyse GBS reads, a reference genome is still not available for a large number of species. Hence, reference-free approaches are required to generate the genetic variability information that can be obtained from a GBS experiment.Unfortunately, available… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clean sequencing data were then used for further downstream processing. We used the DeNovoGBS module in NGSEP v. 4 software for individual read mapping and SNP mining (Parra-Salazar et al 2022). The NGSEP v. 4 software analysis called a total of 526,550 SNPs.…”
Section: Genome-wide Association Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clean sequencing data were then used for further downstream processing. We used the DeNovoGBS module in NGSEP v. 4 software for individual read mapping and SNP mining (Parra-Salazar et al 2022). The NGSEP v. 4 software analysis called a total of 526,550 SNPs.…”
Section: Genome-wide Association Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed read clustering and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling using the DeNovoGBS (Parra-Salazar et al, 2021) module of the software package NGSEP v4.0.1 (Tello et al, 2019). This software is more computationally efficient and has comparable or better accuracy than programs like Stacks or pyRAD (Eaton, 2014) for de novo analysis of genotype-by-sequencing data (Parra-Salazar et al, 2021). We assumed a heterozygosity rate of 1.5% (-h 0.015) as calculated from the short read genome-wide data of the sister species Paramuricea sp.…”
Section: Data Qc and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We de-multiplexed and quality filtered raw sequence RAD-seq reads using the process_radtags program in Stacks v2.1 (Catchen et al, 2013) with the following flags: --inline_null, -r, -c, and -q, with default values. We performed read clustering and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling using the DeNovoGBS (Parra-Salazar et al, 2021) module of the software package NGSEP v4.0.1 (Tello et al, 2019). This software is more computationally efficient and has comparable or better accuracy than programs like Stacks or pyRAD (Eaton, 2014) for de novo analysis of genotype-by-sequencing data (Parra-Salazar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Data Qc and Snp Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed read clustering and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling using the DeNovoGBS (Parra-Salazar et al, 2021) module of the software package NGSEP v4.0.1 (Tello et al, 2019). This software is more computationally efficient and has comparable or better accuracy than programs like Stacks or pyRAD (Eaton, 2014) for de novo analysis of genotype-by-sequencing data (Parra-Salazar et al, 2021). We assumed a heterozygosity rate of 1.5% (-h 0.015) as calculated from the short read genome-wide data of the sister species Paramuricea B3 using the software GenomeScope v2.0 (Vurture et al, 2017) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject number PRJNA574146 (Vohsen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Data Qc and Snp Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%