2022
DOI: 10.1177/23312165221118792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust and Efficient Online Auditory Psychophysics

Abstract: Most human auditory psychophysics research has historically been conducted in carefully controlled environments with calibrated audio equipment, and over potentially hours of repetitive testing with expert listeners. Here, we operationally define such conditions as having high ‘auditory hygiene’. From this perspective, conducting auditory psychophysical paradigms online presents a serious challenge, in that results may hinge on absolute sound presentation level, reliably estimated perceptual thresholds, low an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, participants were pre-screened to ensure that they had met minimum performance criteria in their participation in other MTurk assignments, and participants also were required to pass attention checks throughout the experiment to be included in the main analyses. Second, a robust body of literature has been able to replicate classic auditory findings in an online setting, indicating that when executed properly, online experiments yield equally valid results-with the added benefit of being able to recruit larger, more diverse sample sizes (e.g., see Eerola et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, participants were pre-screened to ensure that they had met minimum performance criteria in their participation in other MTurk assignments, and participants also were required to pass attention checks throughout the experiment to be included in the main analyses. Second, a robust body of literature has been able to replicate classic auditory findings in an online setting, indicating that when executed properly, online experiments yield equally valid results-with the added benefit of being able to recruit larger, more diverse sample sizes (e.g., see Eerola et al, 2021;Zhao et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, prior studies conducted by the authors (e.g., Van Hedger et al, 2017) have shown internal replications of effects in both online and in-lab samples, using similar recruitment parameters as those used in the present study. Finally, the literature asserts the benefits of online studies more broadly given that they are carefully controlled (e.g., Eerola et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2022). As such, we would expect these general findings to replicate in an in-person, laboratory setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Laboratory method is characterised by constant headset setup and autocorrelation noise conditions, while, when conducting the questionnaire online, these parameters may variate slightly or strongly [21,22]. This is why the online method's robustness must be assessed to understand the degree of precision of such an alternative questionnaire method.…”
Section: Online 1 Methods and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%