2012 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/pedes.2012.6484294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust analysis and design of PID controlled AVR system using Pattern Search algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The controller types that have been studied for improving the dynamic response of AVR system are proportional-integral-derivative (PID), fractional order PID (FOPID), gray PID (GPID), and fuzzy logic PID (FLPID). In literature, heuristic optimization-based tuning methods that have been applied to improve performance of the fore mentioned controller types are particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Gaing, 2004), artificial bee colony (ABC) (Gozde and Taplamacioglu, 2011), teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) (Chatterjee and Mukherjee, 2016; Priyambada et al, 2014), gravitational search algorithm (GSA) (Duman et al, 2016; Kumar and Shankar, 2015), chaotic ant swarm (CAS) optimization (Zhu et al, 2009), chaotic optimization based on Lozi map (COLM) (Coelho, 2009), pattern search algorithm (PSA) (Sahu et al, 2012), anarchic society optimization (ASO) (Shayeghi and Dadashpour, 2012), many optimising liaisons (MOL) (Panda et al, 2012), Taguchi combined genetic algorithm (TCGA) (Hasanien, 2013), local unimodal sampling (LUS) optimization (Mohanty et al, 2014), firefly algorithm (FA) (Bendjeghaba, 2014), bio-geography-based optimization (BBO) (Guvenc et al, 2016), Nelder-Mead algorithm (NMA) (Verma et al, 2015), ant colony optimization (ACO) (Suri babu and Chiranjeevi, 2016), cuckoo search (CS) algorithm (Sikander et al, 2018), grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA) (Hekimoglu and Ekinci, 2018) and genetic algorithm (GA) tuned neural networks (NN) (Al Gizi et al, 2015). It is worth mentioning that, in literature, the most studied heuristic optimization methods that have either been proposed or used for comparison with other existing methods for AVR system are PSO, GA, ABC and DE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controller types that have been studied for improving the dynamic response of AVR system are proportional-integral-derivative (PID), fractional order PID (FOPID), gray PID (GPID), and fuzzy logic PID (FLPID). In literature, heuristic optimization-based tuning methods that have been applied to improve performance of the fore mentioned controller types are particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Gaing, 2004), artificial bee colony (ABC) (Gozde and Taplamacioglu, 2011), teaching learning-based optimization (TLBO) (Chatterjee and Mukherjee, 2016; Priyambada et al, 2014), gravitational search algorithm (GSA) (Duman et al, 2016; Kumar and Shankar, 2015), chaotic ant swarm (CAS) optimization (Zhu et al, 2009), chaotic optimization based on Lozi map (COLM) (Coelho, 2009), pattern search algorithm (PSA) (Sahu et al, 2012), anarchic society optimization (ASO) (Shayeghi and Dadashpour, 2012), many optimising liaisons (MOL) (Panda et al, 2012), Taguchi combined genetic algorithm (TCGA) (Hasanien, 2013), local unimodal sampling (LUS) optimization (Mohanty et al, 2014), firefly algorithm (FA) (Bendjeghaba, 2014), bio-geography-based optimization (BBO) (Guvenc et al, 2016), Nelder-Mead algorithm (NMA) (Verma et al, 2015), ant colony optimization (ACO) (Suri babu and Chiranjeevi, 2016), cuckoo search (CS) algorithm (Sikander et al, 2018), grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA) (Hekimoglu and Ekinci, 2018) and genetic algorithm (GA) tuned neural networks (NN) (Al Gizi et al, 2015). It is worth mentioning that, in literature, the most studied heuristic optimization methods that have either been proposed or used for comparison with other existing methods for AVR system are PSO, GA, ABC and DE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intelligence of the SSA was exploited to obtain the best combination of FOPID gains by minimizing a time integrating error fitness function. In order to assess the effectiveness of the proposed design, comparisons of the performance metrics were carried out with different optimization algorithms including DE [14], PSO [15], ABC [14], GOA [16], BBO [17], and PSA [18] on the basis of transient response and stability. The results showed that the FOPID controller tuned by SSA expresses improvement in transient response in comparison to alternate techniques in terms of Mp%, ts, tr, and tp values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that the SSA offers a better solution for the FOPID gains optimal selection problem than other well-known algorithms in terms of transient response indicators. For example, the proposed algorithm based on FOPID tuning provided 52.82%, 17.63%, 38.02%, 0.12%, 24.50%, 7.98%, and 31.1% less overshoot than that of DE [14], PSO [15], ABC [14], BBO [17], GOA [16], PSA [18], and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), respectively. Hence, the proposed algorithm duly validated its performance superiority over the other optimization methods for the same system configuration and parameters.…”
Section: Transient Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [31], the authors used local unimodal sampling (LUS) optimization algorithm for obtaining gain values of a PID controller for the AVR problem. A pattern search (PS) optimization based PID controller was proposed in [32]. In [33], authors proposed biogeography-based optimization (BBO) for PID controller parameter tuning for an AVR system.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%