2018
DOI: 10.1080/16843703.2018.1522997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust AFT-based monitoring procedures for reliability data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, it is also important to extend our approach to develop robust inference procedures under such regression set‐ups. However, while there have been few attempts to develop robust estimation procedures for the AFT models 37‐39 and the semiparametric Cox regression model, 40,41 the robust testing problem still remains unexplored in the literature as discussed earlier for the standard survival data models. In conformity with the more efficient parametric survival models considered in this article, Ghosh and Basu 12 considered a parametric version of the popular Cox regression model and studied the MDPDE (and also the more general M‐estimators) for robustly estimating the model parameters.…”
Section: Future Extensions: Model Selection and Parametric (Cox) Regrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it is also important to extend our approach to develop robust inference procedures under such regression set‐ups. However, while there have been few attempts to develop robust estimation procedures for the AFT models 37‐39 and the semiparametric Cox regression model, 40,41 the robust testing problem still remains unexplored in the literature as discussed earlier for the standard survival data models. In conformity with the more efficient parametric survival models considered in this article, Ghosh and Basu 12 considered a parametric version of the popular Cox regression model and studied the MDPDE (and also the more general M‐estimators) for robustly estimating the model parameters.…”
Section: Future Extensions: Model Selection and Parametric (Cox) Regrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, survival data are often modeled using a member of location-scale and log-locationscale distributions. Weibull is one of the most practical distributions which is known to be helpful in various conditions [23]. As the result, based on the analysis obtained from the real case study, it is assumed that the output variable (survival times) follows Weibull distribution.…”
Section: Monitoring Procedures Based On Risk-adjusted Cusum Control Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For monitoring the lower Weibull percentiles using complete and type‐2 censored data, Wang et al 21 proposed EWMA and CUSUM control charts. Similarly, to monitor Weibull reliability data with dependent influential covariate, Asadzadeh and Baghaei 22 discussed the performance of CUSUM and EWMA control charts. In particular, the AFT models are integrated with robust regression techniques to model the relationship among variables in the presence of outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alma, 36 Multu and Sazak, 37 and Onur and Cetin 38 compared robust regression methods including M‐estimators, MM‐estimator, and S‐estimator against the ordinary least squared estimator. Similarly, Susanti et al 39 developed algorithms for M‐estimator, S‐estimator, and MM‐estimator in a robust regression modeling 22 . Kumar and Jaiswal 40 proposed a median‐based estimator to construct the phase ll control limits when the phase l data set contains outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%