2019 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ccdc.2019.8832368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Adaptive Sliding Mode PI Control for Active Vehicle Seat Suspension Systems

Abstract: In this paper, a robust adaptive sliding mode proportional integral control (RASMPIC) method is proposed for an active vehicle seat suspension system, where the driver's mass is supposed as an unknown parameter with boundaries. A dynamic active seat suspension system is established at first. Then a sliding mode controller (SMC) is designed to achieve the required ride comfort performance based on the driver's mass estimated by utilizing an adaptive law where a projecting adaptive algorithm is used to prevent t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the active suspension system controlled by the Robust controller has been used on many current electric vehicle models [40]. In the studies [41,42], the theories of H2 and Hꝏ optimization were also clearly analysed. In contrast, the Adaptive control method can generate control signals suitable to the vehicle's moving conditions [43].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the active suspension system controlled by the Robust controller has been used on many current electric vehicle models [40]. In the studies [41,42], the theories of H2 and Hꝏ optimization were also clearly analysed. In contrast, the Adaptive control method can generate control signals suitable to the vehicle's moving conditions [43].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 presents a comparative analysis with respect to settling time (s), peak overshoot (m), peak undershoot (m), noise (%), and steady state error e ss . The effect of road impact in the oscillation of the suspension system applying different control approaches such as PID, fuzzy, NF, LQR, H∞ and SM is also presented in Table 3 based on the references [6,11,17,18,20,23] respectively. Similar working conditions are followed with the same level of actuator and sensor noise in all control techniques application for comparison.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimal gain parameter setting, a lesser range of robust control and need of change of gain setting with varying conditions are the major limitations to limit the real time application of these controllers. Among other projected robust control algorithms applied for limiting the oscillation and velocity of the VS system are fuzzy-logic control [8][9][10][11][12][13], fuzzy-PID control [14], genetic algorithm [15], neural network [16], neuro-fuzzy (NF) control [17], linear quadratic regulator (LQR) [18], H-infinity (H∞) control [19,20], and sliding mode (SM) control [21][22][23]. However, even if these control techniques are implemented effectively by absorbing the shocks due to the rough and bumpy road in case of VS system with enhanced accuracy and damping of oscillation, still fail to handle various constraints and random change found in a suspension environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [49], Lin et al have also come up with their integrated controller for the active suspension system. Various ideas for the integrated controller have also been worked out [50][51][52][53]. Based on the stated ideas, this paper focuses on the introduction, design, and evaluation of the double-integrated controller for the active suspension system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%