2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574718000036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust adaptive command filtered control of a robotic manipulator with uncertain dynamic and joint space constraints

Abstract: SUMMARYThe problem of robust adaptive control of a robotic manipulator subjected to uncertain dynamics and joint space constraints is addressed in this paper. Command filters are used to overcome the time derivatives of virtual control, thus reducing the need for desired trajectory differentiations. A barrier Lyapunov function is used to deal with the joint space constraints. A robust adaptive support vector regression architecture is used to reduce filtering errors, approximation errors and handle dynamic unc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ahanda et al [ 14 ] addressed the robust adaptive control of a robotic manipulator under uncertain dynamics and joint space constraints and adopted command filters to overcome the time derivatives of virtual control, eliminating the need for differentiating the desired trajectory. In addition, a barrier Lyapunov function was introduced to handle joint space constraints, and a robust adaptive support vector regression architecture was employed to suppress filtering errors, approximation errors, and dynamic uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahanda et al [ 14 ] addressed the robust adaptive control of a robotic manipulator under uncertain dynamics and joint space constraints and adopted command filters to overcome the time derivatives of virtual control, eliminating the need for differentiating the desired trajectory. In addition, a barrier Lyapunov function was introduced to handle joint space constraints, and a robust adaptive support vector regression architecture was employed to suppress filtering errors, approximation errors, and dynamic uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider (2) satisfying Assumption 1. Virtual inputs are given by ( 5) and ( 17) under the filters ( 8), ( 9), ( 15), (16), and (25). The adaptation laws are (10), ( 18), ( 26), ( 11), (19), and (27).…”
Section: Backstepping Control Signal Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To drive the tracking error toward a sufficiently small value, one can use large W. However, too large a W value usually means that too much control energy is used. Thus, some other control methods based on CFC have been developed, for example, in references [13][14][15][16][17][18], noting that the dimensions of the virtual signal should be enlarged to involve the desired signal and its derivative. Yet, the above-mentioned literature only studied the estimation of some command derivatives, i.e., the results do not correspond to the ABC design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the multiplicative factor of the actuator faults is estimated by an adaptive estimation method, and the additive part is compensated by the upper bound of the faults. Compared with existing flexible manipulator control strategies, the main contributions of this paper are summarized as follows: Different from most of performance constraint for flexible manipulators [45, 50], this paper starts from the transient performance index, and the purpose of controlling overshoot, transient error, and steady-state error can be achieved by introducing two auxiliary functions. Then, a logarithmic BLF is utilized to constrain the transformed state variable. Compared with the traditional PPC shown in refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%